Tag: Business

on by

IP Enforcement in Thailand: Strengthened Multi-Agency Operations and Significant Results in 2025–2026

Thailand has significantly advanced its intellectual property (“IP”) enforcement framework through coordinated efforts led by the Department of Intellectual Property (“DIP”), in close collaboration with the Economic Crime Suppression Division (“ECD”) of the Royal Thai Police, the Customs Department, the Department of Special Investigation (“DSI”), and private-sector IP rights holders. These joint initiatives target counterfeit and infringing goods across physical retail locations, storage facilities, border checkpoints, and online marketplaces, with the dual objectives of disrupting illicit supply chains and protecting both consumer safety and legitimate commercial interests.

Enforcement Outcomes in 2025:

Between January and November 2025, integrated operations produced the following results:

  • 1,132 cases of IP infringement
  • 3,344,841 infringing items seized
  • Estimated economic damages exceeding THB 1.14 billion

Compared with the equivalent period in 2024, the number of cases decreased by 16.15%, while the volume of seized items rose by 21.35% and the value of damages increased by 63.89%. This shift indicates greater focus on high-impact interventions and upstream disruption. Contributions by agency were as follows:

  • ECD: 789 cases, 1,820,574 items seized
  • Customs Department: 336 cases, 571,675 items seized
  • DSI: 7 cases, 952,592 items seized

The DIP structured its enforcement activities through three dedicated task forces:

  • Mobile Patrol Units conducting frequent inspections (at least three days per week) in key Bangkok commercial districts, including MBK Center, Platinum Fashion Mall, Pratunam, Sampheng, Silom, Phrom Phong, and Sukhumvit.
  • Regional Task Forces performing bi-weekly operations in provincial high-risk zones, particularly tourist destinations, wholesale markets, and distribution warehouses.
  • Inspection and Evaluation Units carrying out monthly reviews in designated “red-zone” tourist provinces: Bangkok, Chonburi, Chiang Mai, Phuket, Surat Thani (Koh Samui), Songkhla, Krabi, and Prachuap Khiri Khan.

Key Enforcement Actions in Early 2026:

Enforcement momentum continued into 2026 with intensified targeted operations.

  • DIP and ECD Operations (15–31 January 2026): Thirty-two joint actions across Bangkok shopping malls, retail outlets, and northern and eastern provincial markets resulted in the seizure of 11,802 infringing items (estimated damages over THB 14.9 million) and the arrest of 25 individuals. Seized products included counterfeit footwear, apparel, bags, perfumes, and accessories bearing trademarks of Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Adidas, Nike, and others. A notable warehouse raid in Samut Sakhon Province on 30 January 2026 recovered 223,404 items valued at more than THB 63.2 million in damages, consisting primarily of substandard consumer goods (shampoo, body lotion, facial cream, toothpaste, and motorcycle spark plugs) that present potential health and safety risks.
  • Border Enforcement with the Customs Department (13 January–6 February 2026): Inspections at Laem Chabang Port, Bangkok Port, Si Racha Free Zone, and Aranyaprathet Customs House led to the interception of 42,451 infringing items (estimated damages THB 223.21 million). Goods included counterfeit luxury bags, shoes, watches, perfumes, automotive components, and solar lamps. For fiscal year 2026 up to 6 February, Customs reported 38 cases with total damages exceeding THB 885 million.
  • Online Platform Measures: Pursuant to Memoranda of Understanding with major e-commerce platforms (Lazada, Shopee, TikTok Shop, NocNoc, and Nex Gen Commerce), authorities secured the removal of 2,867 infringing product listings. Efforts are underway to extend similar arrangements to additional providers.

Strategic Direction:

The Intellectual Property Development Plan B.E. 2569–2570 (2026–2027) coordinates more than 30 government agencies to implement sustained, proactive suppression measures. Core elements include targeting upstream manufacturers and distributors, leveraging ancillary legislation (anti-money laundering, taxation, immigration), expanding online enforcement partnerships, holding property owners accountable for tenant infringements, addressing software piracy, and deploying technology to monitor digital infringement channels.

Key Takeaways:

Ongoing multi-stakeholder cooperation, including public reporting through hotline 1368 or www.ipthailand.go.th, will be essential to sustaining progress, enhancing investor confidence, and supporting long-term economic development.

Thailand’s IP enforcement has become markedly more effective, evidenced by higher seizure volumes and damage valuations despite fewer reported cases, reflecting a strategic emphasis on quality over quantity of interventions.

Operations now systematically address the entire supply chain—from importation and warehousing to retail and online distribution—thereby reducing the availability of counterfeit products.

Consumer protection remains central, with authorities repeatedly highlighting the health and safety hazards posed by unregulated, substandard goods.

Rights holders and businesses operating in Thailand are advised to maintain rigorous supply-chain oversight, secure appropriate authorizations, and proactively protect their intellectual property to minimize exposure to enforcement action.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

International Trade: Updates to Thailand’s Certificate of Origin Issuance under TCFTA and AKFTA

The Department of Foreign Trade (DFT) of Thailand has prepared draft notifications to revise the rules, procedures, and conditions for issuing preferential Certificates of Origin under two significant Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). These amendments primarily align the Product Specific Rules (PSRs) with the Harmonized System (HS) 2022 tariff classification, thereby preserving the eligibility of qualifying Thai-origin goods for reduced or exempted customs duties in the respective markets.

1.  Thailand-Chile Free Trade Agreement (TCFTA)
The draft notification governs the issuance of Form TC for goods exported from Thailand to Chile (or vice versa, where applicable). It updates procedures to reflect the transition of PSRs from HS 2012 to HS 2022, following formal decisions by the Thailand-Chile Free Trade Commission, Cabinet approval, and completion of diplomatic note exchanges in late 2025.
Principal features include:

       •  Electronic application submission via the DFT system or authorised agencies.

       •  Mandatory supporting documents: commercial invoice, transport document (e.g., Bill of Lading or Air Waybill), and origin qualification evidence, differentiated for agricultural and industrial products.

       •  Indication of origin criteria in Box 8 (e.g., WO, PE, CC, CTH, CTSH, QVC, SP).

       •  Validity period of 12 months from the date of issuance.

       •  Special provisions covering retroactive issuance (within 1 year, marked “Issued Retroactively”), non-party invoicing, de minimis deviations (DMI ≤10% FOB), accumulation (ACU), exhibition goods, corrections, and replacements.

       •  Retention of supporting documents for 5 years.
The notification is scheduled to enter into force on 1 April 2026, replacing the existing notification dated 2015.

2.  ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreement (AKFTA)
The draft notification pertains to the issuance of Form AK for goods originating in Thailand and exported to the Republic of Korea or other AKFTA member countries. It updates PSRs from HS 2017 to HS 2022, in accordance with joint decisions of relevant ASEAN-Korea sub-committees in mid-2025.
Principal features include:

       •  Electronic submission through the DFT system.

       •  Documentation requirements aligned with those under TCFTA, with specific procedures for agricultural goods (HS Chapters 01–24) and industrial goods (HS Chapters 25–97).

       •  Origin criteria to be indicated in Box 8 (e.g., WO, CTH, RVC 40%, CTC, WO-AK, RVC with actual percentage, CTH+RVC, Specific Processes).

       •  Validity period of 12 months.

       •  Mechanisms for retroactive applications (within 1 year, marked “ISSUED RETROACTIVELY”), back-to-back certification, exhibition goods, third-country invoicing, and replacements (marked “CERTIFIED TRUE COPY”).

       •  Retention of supporting documents for at least 3 years.
The notification is expected to take effect on 1 May 2026, superseding the 2015 notification.

Possible Public Impact:

These revisions are anticipated to deliver net positive outcomes for Thai exporters by ensuring continued and accurate access to preferential tariff treatment under TCFTA and AKFTA, thereby preserving cost competitiveness in the Chilean and Korean markets. Exporters may encounter short-term transitional requirements, including re-assessment of product HS classifications against the updated PSRs, recalculation of regional value content (where relevant), and verification of supply chain documentation. Any delay in adaptation could temporarily jeopardise eligibility for duty reductions or exemptions on specific shipments. Nevertheless, the sustained use of the DFT’s electronic issuance platform is expected to streamline processing, lower long-term administrative costs, and improve overall trade facilitation.

Key Takeaways:

•  The updates align Thailand’s Certificate of Origin procedures with HS 2022 under TCFTA (effective 1 April 2026) and AKFTA (effective 1 May 2026).

•  Exporters must promptly review and adjust HS classifications, origin calculations, and supporting documentation to maintain preferential tariff benefits.

•  The electronic submission system remains central, supporting greater efficiency and compliance.

•  Proactive preparation is essential to avoid disruptions in claiming duty preferences in Chile and Korea.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Thailand Plans to Reform Excise Tax System to Increase Revenue

Excise tax is one of the principal sources of revenue for the Thai Government (“Government”). For fiscal year 2026 (B.E. 2569), the Government has set a target to collect approximately THB 578.2 billion in excise tax revenue.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 (October 2025 – January 2026), excise tax collection was in total amount of THB 191.3 billion, exceeding the Government’s projection by THB 8.3 billion. The higher-than-expected revenue was largely driven by strong domestic consumption and increased spending during the year-end tourism season and the New Year holidays.

To further strengthen fiscal revenue for fiscal year 2026, the Government is considering several reforms to Thailand’s excise tax system.

Plan to Increase Excise Tax Revenue

The Ministry of Finance aims to increase excise tax revenue by approximately 7.6% through several policy measures, including:

  • restructuring the excise tax framework;
  • adjusting tax rates for certain goods and services; and
  • improving tax administration and enforcement.

The Excise Department has conducted policy studies and is expected to submit the proposed reform plan to the Cabinet for consideration soon.

Proposed Reform of Cigarette Excise Tax

Thailand currently applies a two-tier excise tax system for cigarettes, consisting of the following components:

1. Ad Valorem Tax (Based on Retail Price)

  • 25% for cigarettes priced at not more than THB 72 per pack
  • 42% for cigarettes priced above THB 72 per pack

2. Specific Tax (Based on Quantity)

  • THB 1.25 per cigarette (approximately THB 25 per pack)

According to studies conducted by the Fiscal Policy Office, the current two-tier system has reduced government revenue because cigarette manufacturers often maintain retail prices below the THB 72 threshold in order to benefit from the lower tax rate.

To address this issue, the Excise Department is considering the introduction of a single-tier tax rate, under which cigarettes would be taxed at the same rate regardless of retail price. This approach is expected to reduce price distortions and improve tax collection efficiency.

The Excise Department has requested legal clarification from the Council of State regarding whether the proposed tax structure can be implemented. Further progress will likely depend on the policy direction of the new government.

Automobile Excise Tax Changes

The Government has revised the automobile excise tax framework, with tax rates varying depending on the type of vehicle and its environmental performance. The new tax structure came into effect on 1 January 2026.

Under the revised framework, the excise tax rate is determined primarily based on carbon dioxide (“CO₂”) emission levels, replacing the previous approach that focused mainly on engine displacement (cc). As a result, certain vehicle categories are now subject to higher tax rates compared with those applied in 2025.

Key changes include:

  • Internal combustion engine vehicles (“ICE”) with CO₂ emissions of 100 g/km: the tax rate increased from 12% to 13%.
  • ICE vehicles with engines exceeding 3.0 liters, such as luxury cars and supercars: the tax rate increased from 40% to 50%.
  • Hybrid electric vehicles (“HEV”) with CO₂ emissions not exceeding 100 g/km: the tax rate increased from 4% to 6%.
  • HEV with CO₂ emissions between 101–120 g/km: the tax rate increased from 8% to 9%.
  • HEV with CO₂ emissions between 121–150 g/km: the tax rate increased from 8% to 14%.
  • Electric pickup trucks, which were previously exempt from excise tax, are now subject to 2% tax rate.

As a result of this policy shift, the excise tax rate for vehicles in the eco-car segment has increased from 12% to approximately 13–34%, depending on emission levels.

The Government also plans to gradually increase automobile excise tax rates in two additional phases, during 2028–2029 and again in 2030, as part of its long-term environmental and fiscal policy.

Automobile excise tax collection in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 increased partly because manufacturers and consumers accelerated vehicle purchases ahead of the tax increase. Following the implementation of the new tax structure on 1 January 2026, tax revenue from automobiles is expected to increase further in the remaining quarters of fiscal year 2026 due to the higher tax rates introduced under the revised framework.

Other Potential Excise Tax Measures

In addition to the proposed reforms to cigarette excise tax and automobile taxation, the Excise Department is also considering further adjustments to excise taxes on several categories of goods and services. However, the specific criteria and potential tax rate changes have not yet been clearly determined.

These potential measures may include:

  • restructuring excise taxes on petroleum and petroleum products;
  • increasing excise tax rates on sin goods, such as alcohol and beer;
  • introducing taxes on products harmful to health, such as a potential salt tax;
  • imposing taxes on environmentally harmful goods, including possible battery or carbon taxes; and
  • reviewing the taxation of luxury goods and services.

Conclusion

Thailand is considering several reforms to its excise tax system in order to strengthen government revenue and improve tax collection efficiency. Key measures include the potential introduction of a single-tier cigarette tax, revisions to the automobile excise tax framework based on vehicle type and CO₂ emissions, and possible adjustments to taxes on petroleum products, alcohol, health-related products, environmentally harmful goods, and luxury goods and services.

These reforms aim not only to increase government revenue but also to support broader policy objectives, such as promoting environmentally friendly vehicles and reducing harmful consumption. However, higher excise tax rates may also increase costs for businesses and retail prices for consumers.

With the revised automobile tax framework already taking effect on 1 January 2026, together with other proposed measures currently under consideration, excise tax revenue is expected to continue increasing throughout fiscal year 2026. Businesses operating in industries subject to excise tax should closely monitor future policy developments, as upcoming regulatory changes may significantly affect tax costs and compliance obligations in Thailand.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

U.S. Tariff Policy Shift Following Supreme Court Ruling: Thailand Monitors Impact and Prepares Strategic Response

U.S. Supreme Court Limits Presidential Authority to Impose Global Tariffs

On 20 February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a significant ruling in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump by a 6–3 majority. The Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the U.S. President to impose broad global import tariffs.

The Court reasoned that the imposition of tariffs constitutes a fiscal power that is constitutionally vested in the United States Congress rather than the executive branch.

As a consequence, the Court invalidated the Reciprocal Tariff measure previously implemented under IEEPA. The decision could potentially result in the refund of tariffs already collected, estimated at approximately USD 175 billion.

U.S. Introduces Temporary Global Tariff under Trade Act of 1974

Following the ruling, the U.S. President issued a proclamation on the same day invoking authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a temporary import surcharge of 10% on goods imported from all countries for a period of 150 days, citing concerns related to balance-of-payments pressures.

The measure took effect on 24 February 2026. However, on 21 February 2026, the President announced an increase in the tariff rate to 15%, the maximum level permitted under Section 122, effective immediately.

This temporary tariff measure replaces the Reciprocal Tariff framework but includes exemptions for certain strategic goods, including:

  • Certain critical minerals
  • Metals used in currency and bullion
  • Energy and energy products
  • Certain agricultural products
  • Pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients
  • Certain electronics
  • Passenger vehicles, certain light trucks, medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, buses, and related parts
  • Certain aerospace products

Potential Impact on Thailand

The Vice Chairman of the Thai Chamber of Commerce stated that the U.S. court decision does not disrupt the ongoing trade negotiations between Thailand and the United States. Instead, the ruling provides greater legal clarity regarding U.S. trade policy.

From a commercial perspective, the new tariff rate of 15% is lower than the effective tariff rate of approximately 19% previously faced by Thai exports. Consequently, the short-term impact on Thai exporters is expected to be manageable.

In addition, the temporary nature of the measure may create short-term export opportunities, as U.S. importers may accelerate purchases during the 150-day implementation period in anticipation of potential policy changes.

Nevertheless, Thailand may still need to address longstanding U.S. concerns in several areas, including:

  • Production cost structures
  • Government subsidies
  • Anti-dumping issues
  • Labour standards
  • Environmental standards
  • Food safety regulations
  • Intellectual property protection

These issues may become increasingly relevant in the context of future trade policy reviews.

Thai Government Response

The Prime Minister has instructed the Thailand–U.S. trade negotiation team, including the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, together with the Minister of Commerce, to closely monitor developments following the transition from the Reciprocal Tariff framework to the 15% global tariff measure.

While the reduced tariff rate may provide short-term benefits for Thai exports, policymakers recognize the possibility of further U.S. trade measures and will continue to maintain close bilateral engagement.

Thailand’s Strategic Response

To mitigate potential risks and strengthen economic resilience, Thailand is pursuing several strategic initiatives.

1. Continued Engagement with U.S. Trade Authorities

Thailand will continue discussions with the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to safeguard Thai export interests and manage potential tariff risks.

2. Expansion of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)

The government is accelerating negotiations on free trade agreements in order to diversify export markets and reinforce Thailand’s position as a regional trade and investment hub.

Current priorities include:

  • Implementation of FTAs with Sri Lanka and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which have already been signed and are awaiting domestic approval
  • Targeting the conclusion of FTA negotiations with South Korea and the European Union by 2026
  • Advancing trade cooperation between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Canada

3. Support Measures for Businesses

The Ministry of Commerce has established a consultation centre to provide guidance to businesses affected by evolving global trade policies.

4. Investment Promotion and Supply Chain Relocation

Thailand is also working to remove regulatory barriers to investment in order to attract supply-chain relocation into Thailand and the broader ASEAN region.

The Prime Minister has tasked the Office of the Council of State of Thailand with accelerating legal reforms affecting investors, while the Thailand Board of Investment continues to expedite investment approvals under the Board of Investment (BOI) Fast Pass policy.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Partnerships and Limited Companies: Enhanced Measures to Prevent Nominee Arrangements Involving Foreigners

The Department of Business Development (DBD) has identified more than 75,000 companies operating in Thailand with foreign shareholders holding less than 50 percent of shares while engaging in restricted businesses under the schedules of the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (“FBA”). Such structures may indicate the use of Thai nationals as nominees to conceal foreign ownership or control.

To strengthen the prevention of these arrangements, the DBD proposes the Draft Central Partnership and Company Registration Office Order No. .. / 2569 on Criteria and Procedures for Registration of Amendments to Include a Foreigner as a Partner of a Partnership or as an Authorized Signatory of a Limited Company (the “Draft Order”).

The Draft Order aims to prevent Thai nationals from providing assistance, support, or joint participation in business operations with foreign investors in a nominee capacity, which may constitute an offense under section 36 of the FBA.

Key Provisions of the Draft Order:

The Draft Order introduces mandatory in-person verification procedures for specific post-incorporation amendments to registered partnerships and limited companies, supplementing existing controls (such as three-month bank statement requirements for initial registrations involving foreign elements).

1.  Amendments to Partners of Registered Partnerships: For amendments to a registered partnership that originally had all Thai-national partners or previously had foreign partners contributing 50 percent or more of the capital, where the proposed change results in foreign partners collectively holding less than 50 percent of the capital, the Registrar requires:

      •  All existing partners and incoming Thai-national partners to appear in person before the Registrar.

      •  Presentation of valid national identification cards or equivalent photographic identification documents (unexpired).

      •  Recording of formal sworn statements confirming relevant details and denying nominee conduct.

2.  Amendments to Limited Companies: The Draft Order applies to limited companies where all existing authorized directors (with the power to bind the company) are Thai nationals. If an amendment seeks to appoint new directors, change the number or names of authorized directors, or otherwise result in a foreigner becoming an authorized director or co-signatory with binding authority, the Registrar requires:

      •  All existing directors and incoming Thai-national directors to appear in person.

      •  Presentation of valid identification as above.

      •  Recording of formal sworn statements affirming genuine participation and denying nominee arrangements.

3.  Exceptions to the Procedure:
In cases where full compliance is not feasible, the registration application may be accepted upon demonstration of reasonable grounds and receipt of written approval from designated senior officials, including the Head of the Business Registration and Trade Facilitation Group, the Director of the Central Business Registration Division, the Director of the Digital Juristic Person Registration System Promotion and Development Division, or the Director of a relevant Department of Business Development District Office.

Public Consultation and Expected Implementation:

The Draft Order is currently undergoing public consultation, commencing on 29 February 2026 and concluding on 13 March 2026. Following the consultation, submitted feedback will be reviewed, potential revisions made, and the order advanced toward finalization and promulgation. If adopted in its current or a similar form, implementation is tentatively anticipated around early April 2026 or shortly thereafter, subject to official confirmation.

Businesses and Individuals Potentially Affected:

The Draft Order may impact:

  • Limited companies and registered partnerships in Thailand.
  • Thai-national directors, partners, and incoming participants in relevant amendments.
  • Foreign investors or directors seeking involvement through shareholding below 50 percent or signatory authority.
  • Legal practitioners, corporate service providers, and other parties facilitating business registrations.
  • Entities with foreign investment or managerial involvement, particularly in restricted sectors, should review their structures and monitor developments to ensure future compliance.

Conclusion:

The Draft Order represents a targeted extension of the DBD’s intensified efforts to enforce foreign business restrictions and combat nominee practices. By requiring direct verification and sworn declarations from Thai participants. It aims to promote greater transparency and deter circumvention of the FBA. This measure complements—not replaces—prior registration safeguards and aligns with broader regulatory initiatives against illicit nominee structures observed since early 2026.

Stakeholders are advised to consult and seek professional legal advice to prepare for potential requirements once the Draft Order is finalized.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

BOT: Policy Rate Reduced to 1.00% to Support Economic Recovery Amid Heightened Downside Risks

On 25 February 2026, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of Thailand resolved, by a vote of 4 to 2, to reduce the policy interest rate by 0.25 percentage point, from 1.25% to 1.00%, effective immediately. This adjustment shifts the monetary policy stance from neutral to accommodative.

Economic Context and Rationale:

Although, Thai economic growth in the fourth quarter of 2025 surpassed earlier projections—driven by temporary end-of-year factors and firmer underlying momentum in private investment and merchandise exports—overall expansion is forecast to remain below potential in 2026 and 2027. Growth continues to exhibit uneven sectoral performance, constrained by structural impediments, intensified global competition, and concentration in lower value-added segments. Private consumption is expected to moderate, while small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face persistent challenges, including restricted credit access, tight liquidity conditions, and pressure from the appreciated Thai baht.

Headline inflation is subject to heightened downside risks relative to prior assessments, stemming from declining energy prices, potential additional government measures, increased competition, and subdued demand amid below-potential growth. Headline inflation is now projected to return to the target range in the second half of 2027, later than previously anticipated. Core inflation is also expected to remain low. Although deflationary risks are assessed as limited—owing to the absence of widespread price declines—medium-term inflation expectations have moderated slightly yet remain anchored within the target range.

The rate cut is intended to sustain supportive financial conditions, alleviate debt burdens on households and SMEs, and reinforce medium-term inflation expectations in an environment of rising downside risks.

Transmission to the Banking System:

Previous policy rate reductions have already translated into lower interest rates across the banking system and financial markets, thereby reducing financing costs for many borrowers. Nevertheless, overall credit extension continues to contract, and borrowing costs remain elevated for higher-risk SMEs due to prudent lending practices by financial institutions. The Committee underscores the importance of monitoring policy transmission and advocates for additional targeted financial measures to support vulnerable segments.

Commercial banks have responded promptly to the latest policy adjustment by lowering their lending rates, thereby ensuring effective transmission of the easing measure to households and businesses.

Effect and Impact to Investors:

The reduction in the policy rate and the accompanying adjustments by commercial banks hold several implications across asset classes:

•  Equities
Interest-rate-sensitive sectors—such as property development, consumer finance, and retail—are likely to benefit from lower financing costs and potential increases in consumer spending. These dynamics may support improved corporate earnings and valuations, particularly for domestically oriented firms.

•  Fixed Income
Bond yields are anticipated to decline in response to the more accommodative policy stance, generating capital appreciation for holders of existing bonds. However, the widening yield spread between Thai and U.S. government securities may influence foreign capital flows and affect demand for Thai debt instruments.

•  Currency
The Thai baht may face short-term depreciation pressure against major currencies due to the narrowed interest rate differential with key trading partners. While this could enhance the competitiveness of export-oriented companies, it may simultaneously raise input costs for firms reliant on imported materials.

Policy Considerations and Outlook:

The prevailing policy rate is regarded as sufficiently accommodative, consistent with the economic and inflation outlook, and supportive of the gradual return of inflation to the target range over the medium term. At the same time, the Committee remains attentive to preserving limited monetary policy space amid global uncertainties, safeguarding medium-term financial stability, and preventing the accumulation of imbalances associated with prolonged low interest rates.

Structural economic challenges cannot be addressed through monetary policy alone. Complementary measures across fiscal, structural, and targeted support policies are essential to enhance productivity, strengthen competitiveness, and foster sustainable growth.

Key Takeaways:

•  The policy rate has been lowered to 1.00% to adopt a more accommodative stance and bolster economic recovery.

•  The measure addresses below-potential growth, sectoral imbalances, and increasing downside risks to inflation.

•  Debt relief for households and SMEs remains a central objective, supported by effective transmission through commercial bank lending rates.

•  Investors in interest-sensitive equities, fixed income, and export-oriented sectors may experience differentiated impacts.

•  Continued vigilance is required regarding financial stability, exchange rate developments, and the necessity of coordinated multi-policy responses.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

BOT: Bank of Thailand Introduces Stricter Rules on Large Cash Transactions to Combat Illicit Flows

The Bank of Thailand (BOT) is set to implement enhanced oversight on significant cash movements as part of efforts to address gray-area financial activities, reduce risks of money laundering, and promote greater transparency in the financial system.

Under the upcoming regulations, financial institutions will soon be required to perform detailed customer due diligence for any cash withdrawal exceeding 5 million baht in a single transaction. Customers must clearly explain the source of the funds and the intended purpose of the cash. If the explanation is unsatisfactory or unverifiable, banks may restrict or decline to process the transaction.

This measure primarily targets unusual or high-risk cash usage that could be linked to informal, unregulated, or illicit activities. In a later phase, similar requirements will apply to cash deposits of 5 million baht or more, where the origin of the funds must also be justified.

The BOT has indicated that legitimate needs—such as those of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), individuals conducting regular business operations, or other verifiable purposes—will continue to be accommodated, provided appropriate documentation and explanations are provided. However, the rules aim to make large-scale cash handling more accountable and discourage reliance on physical currency for questionable purposes.

Looking ahead, after an initial implementation period and evaluation of impacts (including any effects on ordinary users), the threshold may be lowered to 3 million baht for both withdrawals and deposits to further strengthen controls.

These changes form part of broader initiatives to tackle structural economic vulnerabilities, encourage electronic payments where practical, and limit opportunities for crime or opaque transactions.

Impact on the Public:

Most everyday individuals and small businesses will remain largely unaffected, as transactions below the 5 million baht threshold face no new requirements, and legitimate large needs can proceed with proper justification.

People or entities accustomed to handling large cash amounts (e.g., for property deals, business purchases, or other high-value activities) will need to prepare explanations and supporting evidence in advance, potentially adding time and documentation steps at the bank.

Those involved in informal or gray-area dealings may find it significantly harder to move large sums in cash without scrutiny, increasing the risk of restrictions or reporting to authorities.

Overall, the shift promotes safer, more traceable financial habits while aiming to reduce crime risks associated with large cash volumes and ease burdens through related reviews of common banking fees.

Key Takeaways:

Implementation is expected in the near future (early to mid-March timeframe), giving the public time to adjust to more accountable cash handling practices.

Cash withdrawals over 5 million baht will require clear justification of purpose and source; unsatisfactory explanations may lead to restrictions.

The rules will later extend to large cash deposits and could lower the threshold to 3 million baht after review.

Legitimate users (e.g., SMEs and individuals with valid reasons) can continue transactions by providing details—no outright ban is intended.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Update on Thailand–United States Tariff Negotiations and the New 15% Global Import Tariff

Update on Thailand–United States Tariff Negotiations

On 19 February 2026, the Minister of Commerce provided an update on Thailand’s ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, confirming that discussions remain underway despite several substantive issues on which the parties continue to hold differing positions.

Earlier, on 12 February 2026, Director-General-level consultations were convened to discuss the proposed timeline and structural framework of the contemplated agreement. Both sides reaffirmed their shared objective of concluding the negotiations in a timely and orderly manner. The United States indicated that it would not object to Thailand submitting, in advance, a proposed list of goods for exemption from the Reciprocal Tariff (“RT”) under Annex 3. However, approval of any such exemptions will ultimately depend on the overall balance and final outcome of the negotiations. The Ministry of Commerce has expressed its intention to conclude the negotiations by July 2026.

Thailand’s Tariff Position within ASEAN and Structural Parity under the RT Regime

Thailand currently maintains a tariff position equivalent to that of other ASEAN Member States under the RT framework and is therefore not at a structural disadvantage from a comparative tariff perspective.

Eligibility for exemptions under Annex 3 will depend on the specific terms secured through each country’s bilateral negotiations with the United States, as the United States applies differentiated conditions on a case-by-case basis. Importantly, any preferential treatment granted under Annex 3 does not take effect automatically upon the conclusion of negotiations. Rather, it remains subject to compliance with applicable domestic legal processes and formal procedural requirements.

By way of illustration, in the case of Malaysia, tariff exemptions become operative only after sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date on which the relevant agreement enters into force under Malaysia’s domestic law, together with formal notification to the United States. During this interim period, goods listed under Annex 3 remain subject to the RT in the ordinary course until all requisite procedures have been completed and the exemption becomes fully effective.

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Authority under IEEPA

On 20 February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States, by a 6–3 majority, affirmed a lower court ruling that the U.S. President’s reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) as authority to impose the RT was unlawful. The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the imposition of tariffs, as such authority is constitutionally vested in Congress.

This decision clarified the constitutional allocation of tariff authority and directly affected the legal basis underpinning the previously imposed RT measures.

Imposition of a Global Tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, on 21 February 2026, the U.S. President announced the immediate imposition of a 15% global import tariff pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

The Minister of Commerce confirmed that Thailand is not required to reopen or renegotiate its ongoing discussions in light of this measure, as the tariff rate has been unilaterally determined by the United States. Certain categories of goods remain exempt, and the overall impact has not been assessed as materially adverse.

In the short term, Thailand may derive relative benefits from this development. The previously applicable tariff rate of 19% on Thai goods has been reduced to 15%, resulting in immediate cost savings for Thai exporters. Key sectors expected to benefit include rubber products, frozen seafood, and electronic components—each representing significant export categories to the United States market.

Ongoing Monitoring and the 150-Day Statutory Review Period

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Thai Government will continue to monitor the implementation and legal trajectory of the measure, particularly in light of the 150-day period prescribed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. During this statutory period, the United States retains the authority to modify, extend, or terminate the measure.

Benefits and Risks Arising from the U.S. Tariff Measures

Short-Term Benefits


The reduction of the import tariff rate from 19% to 15% enhances the price competitiveness of Thai goods in the United States market and provides immediate cost relief to Thai exporters.

No Requirement for Renegotiation


As the United States has unilaterally determined the applicable tariff rate and granted exemptions for certain categories of goods, Thailand is not required to reopen negotiations, thereby reducing the administrative and diplomatic burden associated with prolonged discussions.

Opportunity for Market Expansion


Thai exporters may capitalize on the current tariff environment by accelerating exports during this period of reduced rates, ahead of any potential regulatory changes.

Long-Term Risks


If the United States increases tariff rates or introduces additional trade measures following the statutory review period, Thailand may face renewed competitive pressure. It is therefore prudent to prepare contingency strategies, including diversification of export destinations, particularly within ASEAN and the European market.

Conclusion

Recent developments in U.S. tariff policy reflect continued legal and policy volatility—from the Supreme Court’s clarification of presidential authority under IEEPA to the subsequent imposition of a 15% global import tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

While Thailand is not required to renegotiate its position and stands to benefit in the short term from the reduced tariff rate, the uncertainty inherent in the 150-day statutory framework remains a material risk factor. Accordingly, the Thai Government should closely monitor further developments in U.S. trade policy, while private sector stakeholders strategically leverage the current window of opportunity to expand exports, enhance product value, and diversify market exposure in order to strengthen Thailand’s long-term trade resilience.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

BOT: Draft Regulations on Enhanced Customer Due Diligence and Risk Management for Customer Use of Financial Services, Including Cash-Related Transactions

The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has issued draft regulations aimed at strengthening the framework for customer due diligence (CDD), know-your-customer (KYC) processes, and risk management practices among financial institutions (FIs) and specialized financial institutions (SFIs). These proposals establish a comprehensive, risk-based, end-to-end approach to prevent the financial system from being exploited for financial crimes, enhance public confidence in financial services, and provide equitable protection for customers affected by such activities.

The drafts address evolving risks, particularly those associated with abnormal transaction patterns and the inherent challenges of cash-based operations, which remain vulnerable to misuse due to their anonymity and traceability limitations. Key obligations include governance oversight, robust identity verification, continuous transaction monitoring, enhanced due diligence (EDD) for suspicious cases, secure record-keeping, and mandatory reporting of abnormal activities to the BOT.

1. Draft Criteria for Practices and Risk Management Arising from Customers’ Use of Financial Services

This regulation requires FIs and SFIs to implement and continually refine processes throughout the customer relationship lifecycle, proportionate to identified risks.

•  Governance: The board of directors and senior management must establish and approve risk-based CDD/KYC policies, ensure adequate resources, and conduct periodic reviews. Significant policy amendments require board approval. Institutions must maintain clear structures for roles, responsibilities, and the three lines of defense to support effective risk controls.

•  KYC and CDD: Institutions must verify customer identity and authenticity using reliable sources, identify beneficial owners, and prevent identity fraud. For savings accounts (high-risk products), specific verification methods apply:

       •  Thai individuals: Primary use of national smart cards via readers and electronic government systems, with defined alternatives for exceptional cases.

       •  Foreign individuals: Passports and verifiable residency documents, preferably using technologies such as Near Field Communication (NFC), along with evidence of purpose of stay.

       •  Legal entities: Official registration documents to determine ownership, control, and business nature.

•  Monitoring and Enhanced Due Diligence: Continuous systems must detect abnormal transactions or behaviors. Upon identification of anomalies, EDD is required, including inquiries into source of funds, financial status, and transaction purpose. Transactions must be rejected if EDD cannot be satisfied or if criminal indicators are evident.

•  Customer Support: Fair and prompt procedures must assist customers impacted by risk management actions who are not involved in suspicious conduct.

•  Record-Keeping and Reporting: Customer and transaction data must be securely retained for prescribed periods to support regulatory oversight. Suspicious transactions and abnormal patterns must be reported to the BOT in specified formats.

2. Draft Criteria for Practices and Risk Management of Cash-Related Transactions

This regulation imposes heightened controls on cash activities—including deposits, withdrawals, cashier’s cheques, and currency exchanges—conducted through branches or electronic channels, recognizing cash’s role in facilitating illicit flows.

•  Strengthened Identity Verification: Customers must present themselves or complete verified authentication before engaging in any cash-related transaction to eliminate anonymous or proxy movements.

•  Monitoring Abnormal Cash Movements: Institutions must monitor for patterns inconsistent with customer profiles or lacking economic rationale, including excessive high-value or frequent transactions.

•  Enhanced Due Diligence for High-Value Cash Transactions: Abnormal patterns trigger EDD. If purpose or legitimacy cannot be verified, transactions must be refused, with mandatory reporting to the BOT.

•  Support for Affected Customers: Processes must ensure timely and equitable assistance for victims of financial crimes, particularly in cash-related contexts.

These draft regulations represent the BOT’s ongoing commitment to bolstering anti-money laundering measures, improving transparency, and safeguarding the integrity of Thailand’s financial system through stricter oversight of customer onboarding, verification, and high-risk transactions.

Key Takeaways:

•  Financial institutions and specialized financial institutions will be required to adopt comprehensive risk-based CDD/KYC frameworks across the full customer lifecycle.

•  Governance responsibilities rest with boards and senior management to ensure effective policies, resources, and controls.

•  Cash transactions face particular scrutiny, mandating identity verification, monitoring of unusual patterns, and refusal of unverified high-risk activities.

•  Enhanced monitoring, EDD, secure record retention, and regulatory reporting aim to detect and mitigate financial crime risks promptly.

•  Institutions must balance risk management with fair treatment of legitimate customers impacted by these measures.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Liquor Import: Draft Ministerial Regulation to Modernize Liquor Import Framework and Support Tourism Sector

On 3 February 2026, the Thai Cabinet approved in principle the draft Ministerial Regulation on Permission to Import Liquor into the Kingdom (amending the Ministerial Regulation B.E. 2560 [2017], as amended by Ministerial Regulation No. 2 B.E. 2562 [2019]), as proposed by the Ministry of Finance through the Excise Department.

The primary purpose of this amendment is to update and rationalize the regulatory regime governing liquor imports. The existing framework has imposed certain procedural and substantive limitations that hinder legitimate business activities and complicate excise tax administration under the licensing system. The revision seeks to streamline procedures, remove unnecessary legal obstacles, facilitate importers, strengthen tax oversight through digital tools, and align the regime with national policies to promote tourism by enhancing product diversity, stimulating tourist spending, and creating greater economic value in the sector, consistent with the Cabinet resolution dated 28 November 2023.

The draft regulation introduces four substantive amendments:

1.  Clarification and Strengthening of Type 5 Import License Provisions
The amendment grants the Director-General of the Excise Department explicit authority to define detailed criteria, procedures, and permitted purposes for Type 5 licenses (covering imports not falling under Types 1–4). This resolves previous ambiguity that allowed broad interpretation and potential misuse.
Initial categories to be specified include importation for re-export, use as raw material or component in non-liquor industries, importation as non-commercial samples or for personal consumption (limited to 200 litres per occasion), and importation of rectified spirit for industrial production of plant-based ethylene.

2.  Abolition of the Sole Agent Requirement for Type 1 Import Licenses
The previous condition requiring Type 1 license applicants (import for sale, excluding duty-free retail under customs law) to be the exclusive agent of the imported brand is removed. This change enables multiple importers to handle the same brand, thereby fostering greater competition.
The relaxation will initially apply only to wine and sparkling wine. The Director-General retains discretion to reimpose the sole agent condition for other liquor categories if warranted. The Excise Department’s Imported Liquor Price Database system now provides reliable price benchmarking, valuation, and smuggling detection capabilities, rendering the sole agent mechanism less essential for tax control.

3.  Introduction of Electronic Submission Channels
Applications for import licenses may now be filed either in person at the appropriate Excise Area Office or Branch Office (corresponding to the Customs clearance location) or electronically via designated digital platforms. This dual mechanism significantly improves administrative efficiency and accessibility for importers.

4.  Simplification of Label Submission Requirements (Type 1 Licenses)
The mandatory prior approval of container labels before applying for a Type 1 license has been eliminated. Importers are now required only to submit sample labels that fully comply with the criteria and content specifications announced by the Director-General of the Excise Department. This reduction in procedural burden is supported by the department’s established electronic label verification infrastructure.

The Ministry of Finance has confirmed that the amendments do not alter excise tax rates or taxable bases; accordingly, no reduction in state revenue is anticipated. The revised system is expected to enhance tax collection effectiveness and further curb illicit importation.

The proposal was subject to public hearing and received concurrence in principle from relevant ministries and agencies, including Tourism and Sports, Commerce, Public Health, Industry, and the Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. The Council of State has advised that the Cabinet possesses the authority to approve the draft in principle, as the matter constitutes routine regulatory adjustment and does not impose binding obligations on future administrations pursuant to Section 169 (1) of the Constitution.

Key Takeaways:

•  The regulation modernizes Thailand’s liquor import licensing regime by removing outdated restrictions and integrating digital processes.

•  Elimination of the sole agent requirement (initially for wine and sparkling wine) promotes fairer market competition and greater product availability.

•  Enhanced administrative efficiency through electronic applications and simplified label procedures reduces burdens on legitimate importers.

•  Fiscal neutrality is preserved; no tax rate reductions are involved, while improved oversight is expected to strengthen revenue collection and reduce smuggling.

•  The measure directly supports national tourism objectives by facilitating greater variety and accessibility of imported alcoholic beverages, thereby encouraging tourist expenditure and sector growth.

•  Upon publication in the Royal Gazette, the amended regulation will enter into force, marking a structured step toward a more competitive, transparent, and tourism-aligned import framework.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles