Tag: Law Amendment

on by

BOI Unveils Draft National Semiconductor Roadmap Aiming to Attract Over 2.5 Trillion Baht in Investments

The Board of Investment (BOI) has presented the draft National Strategy for the Development of the Semiconductor and Advanced Electronics Industry to the National Semiconductor and Advanced Electronics Policy Committee. This comprehensive roadmap, prepared since April 2025 with the assistance of a leading global consulting firm, outlines a long-term vision to position Thailand as a leading hub for semiconductor production in the region.

The strategy builds upon Thailand’s existing strengths in downstream activities, such as outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing (OSAT) and integrated circuit design, while advancing capabilities across the full value chain—from upstream wafer fabrication to high-value design and production. The ultimate objective is to achieve “Made-in-Thailand Chips” by 2050, fostering a complete and integrated semiconductor ecosystem.

Strategic Focus and Targets:

The roadmap targets investments exceeding 2.5 trillion baht over the 25-year period from 2026 to 2050. It also aims to develop more than 230,000 highly skilled personnel to support industry growth.

Emphasis is placed on five product categories where Thailand demonstrates strong potential and alignment with domestic industries:

•  Power chips

•  Sensor chips

•  Photonics chips

•  Analog chips

•  Discrete chips

These segments are closely linked to key sectors including automotive, electronics, telecommunications, data centers, artificial intelligence, automation, and medical applications.

Phased Development Approach:

In the initial five-year phase (2026–2030), efforts will concentrate on leveraging current advantages in OSAT, IC design, and advanced electronics, while initiating investments in wafer fabrication and nurturing domestic enterprises to emerge as leading players. Subsequent phases will progressively expand the value chain toward full self-reliance in high-value production.

Five Key Driving Mechanisms:

To realize these ambitions, the strategy proposes action across five critical areas:

1.  Investment Incentives — Provision of financial support, including grants and long-term low-interest loans, to attract priority projects.

2.  Human Capital Development — Establishment of specialized curricula, industry-academia collaborations (both domestic and international), and vocational training programs to build expertise in semiconductor engineering and advanced research.

3.  Technology Advancement — Upgrading national research centers and fostering partnerships among government, private sector, and academic institutions for research and development.

4.  Infrastructure Enhancement — Development of dedicated clusters, reliable utilities (including clean energy), water systems, and robust disaster management capabilities.

5.  Business Environment Improvement — Streamlining approvals and permits, negotiating international trade agreements, and implementing government procurement mechanisms to support local enterprises.

Competitive Positioning and Supporting Context:

Although, Thailand’s semiconductor industry remains in its early stages compared to regional leaders such as Singapore and Malaysia, or competitors including Vietnam and the Philippines, the country possesses competitive advantages in infrastructure, workforce quality, business environment, and downstream industries.

From 2018 to November 2025, the electrical and electronics sector attracted 1,748 investment promotion applications totaling 1.17 trillion baht, representing 19% of all promoted investments and underscoring its status as the leading sector. The global semiconductor market is projected to reach 1 trillion U.S. dollars by 2030, presenting significant opportunities for strategic growth.

Key Takeaways:

•  Thailand’s national semiconductor roadmap targets over 2.5 trillion baht in investments and the development of more than 230,000 skilled professionals by 2050.

•  Focus is directed toward five high-potential chip categories that align with the country’s established industrial strengths.

•  A five-pillar approach addresses incentives, talent, technology, infrastructure, and business facilitation to build a complete ecosystem.

•  The strategy emphasizes transitioning from assembly-focused activities to high-value design and fabrication, aiming for “Made-in-Thailand Chips” and regional leadership in the sector.

•  This initiative positions the semiconductor industry as a key driver of long-term economic competitiveness amid rapid global technological and supply chain evolution.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Online Platform: ETDA’s Push for New Rules on Social Commerce to Safeguard Thai Consumers

In a move to tighten oversight on digital marketplaces, Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) is gearing up to introduce new regulations targeting social commerce platforms. This initiative aims to close loopholes in consumer protection, ensuring that online transactions meet stringent standards amid the growing popularity of buying and selling via social media. The announcement comes as platforms like Facebook argue they fall outside traditional e-commerce definitions, prompting ETDA to expand its regulatory net.

The backdrop for these changes is rooted in Thailand’s evolving digital economy. With e-commerce booming, the existing Electronic Transactions Committee’s announcement—set to take effect on December 31, 2025—already mandates that e-commerce platforms sell or advertise products adhering to standards from the Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, social media giants such as Facebook have claimed exemption, citing the absence of integrated payment systems and separate user accounts for transactions. ETDA has countered this, stating, “Facebook has informed ETDA that they do not fall under the category. We are therefore preparing a new announcement to cover Facebook, as it cannot be denied that Facebook is widely used as a platform for buying and selling goods known as social commerce, which requires strict product standards.”

This conciliatory approach by ETDA also considers international trade dynamics, particularly U.S. policies under President Donald Trump, which threaten trade retaliation against countries restricting American platforms. By avoiding overly restrictive measures, Thailand seeks to balance consumer safety with open trade, preventing potential barriers for U.S.-based companies operating in the region.

Beyond social commerce, the new rules will extend to space-sharing platforms like Airbnb. ETDA plans to enforce standards for user safety, identity verification, and tenant rights, addressing common issues such as leaks or power outages. Additionally, concerns over monopolistic practices in delivery services—previously requiring platforms to offer at least three shipping options—have been shifted to the Trade Competition Commission (TCC) for handling and streamlining regulatory responsibilities.

These developments underscore Thailand’s commitment to fostering a secure digital ecosystem. As social commerce continues to thrive, with platforms blending social interaction and shopping, the need for robust oversight has become evident. ETDA’s efforts aim not only to protect consumers from substandard or unsafe products but also to promote fair competition and innovation in the online space.

Key Takeaways:

Future Implications: This could set a precedent for more comprehensive digital platform governance in Thailand, boosting trust in online transactions.

Expanded Regulation: ETDA’s new announcement will include social commerce platforms like Facebook, requiring them to enforce product standards from TISI and the FDA to plug consumer protection gaps.

Consumer Focus: The rules prioritize Thai buyers’ safety by mandating quality controls on goods sold online, effective from late 2025 onward.

International Considerations: A balanced approach avoids trade conflicts with the U.S., aligning with global digital trade norms.

Broader Scope: Space-sharing services like Airbnb will face new safety and rights standards, while delivery monopolies fall under TCC jurisdiction.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Updated Regulation on Official Secrets: Modernization, Electronic Security Measures, and Comparison with International Standards

On 30 December 2025, the Thai Cabinet approved in principle the draft Regulation on the Protection of Official Secrets (No. ..) B.E. …., as proposed by the Office of the Permanent Secretary to the Prime Minister. This revision updates the framework established in B.E. 2544 (2001), primarily to address the increasing reliance on electronic systems in government operations and resolve limitations in handling classified information digitally.

Background and Rationale:

The original regulation, enacted pursuant to Section 16 of the Official Information Act, B.E. 2540 (1997), mandated measures to prevent leakage of official secrets. It detailed procedures for classification, copying, translation, transfer, transmission, disclosure, destruction, storage, backup, and security, but focused predominantly on paper-based documents.

With the widespread adoption of electronic systems, agencies faced operational delays when handling classified information, often reverting to paper methods for compliance. This practice conflicted with the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on Administrative Correspondence (No. 4), B.E. 2564 (2021), which promotes electronic administration.

The need for reform was identified as early as the Official Information Board No. 2/2554 meeting in March 2011, leading to the formation of a sub-committee. The revised draft, endorsed by the Board in its no. 2/2568 meeting on 28 October 2025, was subsequently submitted to the Cabinet.

Key Amendments: Electronic Classified Information

The primary enhancement is the introduction of Chapter 5: Electronic Classified Information, comprising 26 new provisions (Sections 50/1 to 50/26). These establish comprehensive guidelines for digital management of classified data, covering:

•  Classification and marking of electronic documents.

•  Procedures for creation, copying, translation, transfer, transmission, receipt, and disclosure via digital channels.

•  Secure storage, backup, and recovery to mitigate loss or unauthorised destruction.

•  Cybersecurity measures, including encryption, access controls, and system auditing.

•  Protocols for secure destruction of electronic classified information when no longer needed.

These provisions aim to facilitate efficient inter-agency coordination and public service delivery while preserving confidentiality.

Expected Benefits:

By providing clear protocols for electronic transmission, the regulation enhances administrative speed and aligns secrecy practices with modern information technology. It supports digital transformation in public administration without compromising national security or obligations under the Official Information Act, B.E. 2540 (1997).

Next Steps:

The Cabinet has directed submission of the draft to the Committee for the Scrutiny of Draft Legislation and Subordinate Legislation Proposed to the Cabinet. This review will incorporate observations from entities such as the Office of the Public Sector Development Commission, the Office of the Council of State, the Digital Government Development Agency, the National Economic and Social Development Council, and the National Security Council. Formal promulgation will follow upon completion.

Comparison with International Standards:

Thailand’s revisions demonstrate strong alignment with global best practices in electronic handling of classified information, which universally emphasize encryption, access controls, auditing, and secure storage.

•  United States: Executive Order 13526 and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 offer detailed, risk-based controls across multiple families (e.g., Access Control, System and Communications Protection). Thailand’s provisions mirror these in core areas but are less granular.

•  European Union: Council Decision 2013/488/EU requires approved cryptography for higher classifications and comprehensive information assurance. Thailand parallels this in transmission and storage requirements.

•  United Kingdom: The Official Secrets Act 1989 (as amended) and related policies incorporate encryption and secure systems, with recent enhancements under the National Security Act 2023 addressing contemporary threats.

•  ISO/IEC 27001: This standard mandates risk-based information classification and controls for transfer and protection. Thailand’s government-specific rules complement this approach.

Similarities include mandates for encrypted transmission, restricted access, secure storage, and audited destruction. Differences lie in depth: international frameworks like NIST provide extensive, customizable controls and certification requirements, whereas Thailand’s update remains procedurally focused on administrative adaptation.

Overall, this reform represents a commendable advancement toward international convergence, bolstering Thailand’s digital governance while upholding robust confidentiality safeguards. Further enhancements could involve adopting more detailed risk-based mechanisms and independent certification processes observed in mature systems.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Tax Obligations and Compliance for Foreign Residents in Thailand

Under Thailand’s taxation framework, foreign individuals residing in the country are subject to specific tax obligations, particularly when they are also liable for taxation in other jurisdictions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the Thai tax system for individuals residing in Thailand for 180 days or more, including the requirements for filing tax returns, allowable deductions, the application of Double Taxation Agreements, and penalties for non-compliance.

Tax Residency and Taxable Income in Thailand:

According to Thai tax law, an individual who resides in Thailand for a cumulative period of 180 days or more within a calendar year (1 January to 31 December) is classified as a “tax resident of Thailand.” Tax residents are subject to Personal Income Tax (PIT) on the following categories of income:

  1. Income Derived from Sources Within Thailand:
Such income is taxable regardless of whether it is paid within Thailand or abroad.
  1. Foreign-Sourced Income:
Such income is subject to Thai PIT if it is earned on or after 1 January 2024 and remitted to Thailand in any year. However, foreign-sourced income earned prior to 1 January 2024 is exempt from Thai PIT, even if remitted to Thailand on or after 1 January 2024.

Tax Return Filing Requirements:

Thai tax residents who earn income from sources within Thailand or who remit foreign-sourced income to Thailand (as described above) are required to file a tax return with the Thai Revenue Department within 31 March of the following year for the preceding calendar year’s income.

Deductions and Allowances:

Not all income is subject to taxation, as certain types of income are exempt, including severance pay up to a specified amount, retirement benefits, and bank interest that has already been withheld at source. Additionally, taxpayers may claim deductions for various expenses based on the type of income received.

Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) and Tax Credits:

To mitigate the risk of double taxation, Thailand has entered into DTAs with various countries. These agreements aim to prevent income from being taxed in both Thailand and the country where it was earned. Foreign residents subject to Thai PIT may be eligible for either a tax exemption or a foreign tax credit, depending on the provisions of the applicable DTAs and the type of income involved.

Penalties for Non-Compliance:

Failure to comply with the above requirements results in fines and surcharges.

Conclusion:

Foreign residents in Thailand who meet the 180-day residency threshold must carefully navigate their tax obligations to ensure compliance with Thai tax law. This includes understanding the scope of taxable income, both from Thai and foreign sources, fulfilling tax return filing requirements, leveraging allowable deductions and DTAs benefits, and adhering to deadlines to avoid penalties. By maintaining accurate records and submitting properly certified documentation, taxpayers can effectively manage their tax liabilities and ensure compliance with the Thai Revenue Department’s regulations. 

Source: International Comparison December 2025: Antea

Read Full Article

on by

Cannabis: Stricter Controls with New Draft Ministerial Regulation

The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) is progressing with a new draft ministerial regulation to impose tighter oversight on cannabis, prioritizing medical applications and consumer safeguards amid a notable decline in commercial outlets.

The draft, titled “Ministerial Regulation on Permits for Research, Export, Sale, or Processing of Controlled Herbs for Commercial Purposes (No. .. ) B.E. ….”, has received Cabinet approval and is undergoing review by the Office of the Council of State prior to final approval.

This update replaces the 2016 regulation, which is deemed insufficient for the evolving cannabis landscape. It introduces targeted mechanisms for commercial export, sale, and processing to safeguard public health and minimize community disruptions.

Principal Requirements Under the Draft Regulation:

•  Restricted Sales Venues: Commercial distribution limited to medical treatment facilities (with physician prescriptions and supervised dispensing), pharmacies, herbal product outlets, or traditional Thai medicine practitioner sites.

•  Staffing Standards: At least one employee certified by the Department of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine must be on duty during business hours.

•  Operational Guidelines: Mandatory efficient systems for odor and smoke elimination to avoid public nuisance; premises must be legally owned or possessed; dedicated storage with controlled temperature, humidity, separation from other items, and no direct floor contact.

•  Transitional Provisions: Current licenses are valid until expiry, but all renewals, new permits, or pre-enactment applications must adhere to the updated standards.

The MOPH has affirmed sufficient qualified medical professionals nationwide to support the framework and guaranteed uninterrupted access for patients requiring cannabis therapeutically through hospital-based prescriptions.

Recent data indicate substantial industry contraction: As of late 2025, 18,433 registered establishments existed nationwide, 8,636 expiring licenses in 2025, only 1,339 (15.5%) were renewed, resulting in over 7,297 closures and an estimated 11,136 remaining. Further expirations are anticipated: 4,587 in 2026 and 5,210 in 2027.

Many operators appear to be closing in anticipation of the elevated compliance thresholds rather than adapting.

Key Takeaways:

•  Medical-Centric Shift: Sales confined to regulated health-related venues, emphasizing prescription-based access over general retail.

•  Mandatory Business Upgrades: Requirements for infrastructure, storage, environmental controls, and trained personnel will challenge existing operators.

•  Industry Downsizing: Thousands of outlets have already closed without renewal, foreshadowing further consolidation.

•  Patient Protections: Therapeutic users assured continued supply via national hospital networks.

•  Implementation Timeline: Final enactment expected soon after review; broader policy direction may vary with future administrations.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

The Repeal of Selected National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) Announcements and Orders in Thailand

On 29 December 2025, the Royal Gazette published the Act on the Repeal of Certain Announcements of the National Council for Peace and Order, Orders of the National Council for Peace and Order, and Orders of the Head of the National Council for Peace and Order That Are No Longer Necessary and Inappropriate for the Present Circumstances, B.E. 2568 (2025). This legislation repeals 55 such instruments in total: 48 take effect immediately on 30 December 2025, while 7 are repealed subject to specific conditions or transitional measures aligned with the original provisions.

This act represents a significant effort to eliminate remnants of the military junta’s authority, known as the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), which governed Thailand following the coup d’état on 22 May 2014.

Historical Context of the NCPO and Its Instruments:

The NCPO seized power in 2014, suspending the constitution and imposing martial law. During its rule until the 2019 elections, the junta issued hundreds of announcements and orders under absolute authority granted by Section 44 of the interim constitution. These instruments—comprising announcements by the NCPO, orders by the NCPO, and orders by its head—totaled over 500 and addressed political restrictions, administrative reforms, economic projects, security measures, and public order.

Many suppressed political activities, limited freedom of expression, and bypassed standard legislative processes, including environmental assessments and urban planning requirements for major projects. Although the NCPO dissolved in July 2019, Article 279 of the 2017 Constitution preserved the legal force of these instruments, requiring parliamentary action for repeal.

Previous partial repeals occurred in 2019 through NCPO Head Order No. 9/2562, which revoked approximately 61-87 instruments deemed to have achieved their objectives. Further limited repeals followed, but numerous orders persisted, prompting calls from civil society and political parties to address those infringing on rights or outdated.

Legislative Process Leading to the 2025 Repeal Act:

Efforts to repeal NCPO instruments gained momentum post-2019. In 2024-2025, multiple draft bills emerged from the Cabinet and opposition parties. The Cabinet initially proposed repealing 23 instruments in July 2024. Parliamentary committees, chaired by figures such as Chaturon Chaisang (Pheu Thai Party), consolidated these into broader legislation.

The House of Representatives approved the consolidated bill in July 2025, repealing up to 55 orders following debates on civil liberties, environmental safeguards, and administrative efficiency. The Senate endorsed it without opposition in September-October 2025. The final act, published on 29 December 2025, reflects this bipartisan consensus to align governance with democratic norms.

Scope and Impact of the Repeal:

The act targets instruments no longer necessary or incompatible with current conditions. The 48 fully repealed items include those restricting political expression, online monitoring, and certain security measures. The 7 conditionally repealed ones likely involve complex areas, such as urban planning exemptions for industrial projects or southern border administration, where transitional provisions prevent abrupt disruptions (e.g., potential lawsuits or policy gaps).

This repeal partially dismantles the NCPO’s legacy by restoring standard legal processes and enhancing civil liberties. However, some orders remain in force, particularly those integrated into permanent laws or requiring separate amendments. Ongoing reviews suggest potential future repeals.

In summary, this 2025 legislation marks a deliberate step toward normalizing Thailand’s legal framework, reducing the enduring influence of the 2014 coup-era junta while balancing continuity in governance. It underscores the role of parliamentary oversight in transitioning from authoritarian measures to democratic principles.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Penal Code Amendment (No. 30): Criminalizing Sexual Harassment and Implications for Workplace Policies

On December 30, 2025, the Royal Gazette published the Penal Code Amendment Act (No. 30), B.E. 2568 (2025), marking a significant advancement in Thailand’s legal framework for addressing sexual offenses. This amendment introduces “sexual harassment”  as a distinct criminal offense, refines existing provisions to reflect contemporary societal dynamics, and emphasizes protection for individuals across all genders, ages, and identities. By elevating such acts from minor infractions to criminal liability, the law seeks to deter perpetrators, enhance victim support, and foster a safer society. The changes address limitations in prior legislation, which often treated harassment merely as a petty offense causing annoyance, insufficient for the severity and diversity of modern incidents.

Key Changes Introduced by the Amendment:

The amendment encompasses several pivotal modifications to the Thai Penal Code:

1.  Expanded Definition of “Rape”: The definition is broadened to include emerging forms of sexual violation, ensuring inclusivity for diverse gender identities and modern contexts.

2.  Abolition of the Offense of “Indecent Act by Intrusion”: This provision is repealed to modernize and streamline the legal structure.

3.  Establishment of Sexual Harassment as a Criminal Offense: A new, dedicated section defines sexual harassment broadly as any act—physical, verbal, auditory, gestural, communicative, involving stalking, or conducted via computer systems—with sexual connotations that causes another person distress, annoyance, embarrassment, or a sense of insecurity. This encompasses:

       •  Physical actions or contact.

       •  Verbal remarks, sounds, or displays.

       •  Persistent communication, following, or monitoring.

       •  Digital interactions, such as through emails, social media, or online platforms.

These updates recognize the evolving nature of sexual offenses, including those affecting individuals of all ages, genders, and sexual orientations, and account for the psychological and physical harm inflicted.

Penalties Under the New Provisions:

Penalties are structured progressively to reflect the offense’s severity, context, and impact:

•  General Cases: Imprisonment not exceeding 1 year, a fine not exceeding 20,000 baht, or both.

•  Repeated or Continuous Acts (disrupting the victim’s normal life): Imprisonment not exceeding 2 years, a fine not exceeding 40,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts in Public Places or Via Computer Systems: Imprisonment not exceeding 3 years, a fine not exceeding 60,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts Against Children (under 15 years): Imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, a fine not exceeding 100,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts by Persons in Authority (e.g., supervisors, employers, or those with power over the victim): Imprisonment not exceeding 3 years, a fine not exceeding 60,000 baht, or both.

This graduated approach underscores heightened accountability in cases involving vulnerability, repetition, public exposure, digital means, or power imbalances, particularly relevant in professional settings.

Broader Implications for Society and Business Operations:

The amendment responds to the increasing prevalence and complexity of sexual offenses in Thai society, where traditional laws proved inadequate. By criminalizing a wider array of behaviors, it aims to improve enforcement, provide stronger deterrence, and offer more effective remedies for victims. For businesses, the law has profound implications, especially given the elevated penalties for acts committed by authority figures. Organizations must adapt to avoid criminal liability for individuals, potential vicarious responsibility, reputational harm, or related civil claims.

Businesses, particularly those with employee hierarchies, customer interactions, or digital operations, should undertake the following preparations:

•  Policy Revision and Development: Update or create comprehensive anti-harassment policies that explicitly incorporate the new legal definition, including workplace-specific examples such as inappropriate comments during meetings, unwanted advances by supervisors, or harassing digital messages.

•  Training Initiatives: Implement mandatory, regular training programs for all employees, with specialized sessions for managers highlighting their increased responsibilities and risks under the law.

•  Robust Reporting and Investigation Frameworks: Establish multiple confidential reporting channels (e.g., HR contacts, anonymous hotlines) and impartial investigation procedures with clear timelines, ensuring protection against retaliation.

•  Risk Mitigation Strategies: Conduct assessments in high-exposure areas, such as supervisory roles or public-facing positions, and integrate policy references into employment contracts and handbooks.

•  Victim Support Measures: Provide resources like counseling, accommodations, and legal referrals to support affected individuals.

•  Ongoing Monitoring: Perform annual reviews of policies and maintain detailed records of compliance efforts as evidence of due diligence.

Consultation with legal and human resources experts is recommended to ensure alignment with complementary laws, such as the Labour Protection Act and the Gender Equality Act.

Developing Effective Workplace Harassment Policies:

In light of the amendment, workplace policies must be thorough and proactive. Essential components include:

1.  Precise Definitions and Illustrations: Mirror the statutory definition while providing contextual examples relevant to the organization’s environment.

2.  Comprehensive Scope: Extend coverage to employees, contractors, clients, and visitors, including remote work and work-related events.

3.  Accessible Reporting Mechanisms: Offer diverse, secure options with prompt acknowledgment and anti-retaliation safeguards.

4.  Fair Investigation Processes: Detail impartial, timely procedures involving trained personnel and thorough documentation.

5.  Disciplinary Measures: Outline consequences proportionate to the offense, up to termination, while addressing power dynamics.

6.  Preventive Education: Require ongoing training to promote awareness and cultural change.

7.  Support Services: Ensure access to assistance for complainants and respondents.

8.  Regular Evaluation: Commit to periodic audits and updates in response to legal or societal developments.

Leadership endorsement and cultural commitment are crucial for effective implementation.

Key Takeaways:

•  The 2025 amendment represents a landmark progression in Thailand’s approach to sexual offenses, criminalizing harassment in its various forms and imposing substantial penalties, effective from December 30, 2025.

•  It particularly heightens risks for those in positions of authority, necessitating urgent workplace adaptations.

•  Organizations that prioritize robust policies, training, and procedures will not only achieve compliance but also cultivate safer, more inclusive environments.

•  This reform aligns with global standards for victim protection and societal safety, encouraging proactive measures across all sectors.

•  Employers are advised to stay informed through official sources, such as the Royal Gazette and relevant ministries, for any additional guidance or interpretations. Prompt action will mitigate risks and contribute to a more equitable professional landscape in Thailand.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Progress in Thai–U.S. Trade Negotiations

On 12 December 2025, Thailand’s Minister of Commerce announced that the United States had conveyed a positive signal regarding the advancement of bilateral trade discussions. Washington indicated its intention to request the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to commence technical-level negotiations on tariffs and trade matters with Thailand.

This announcement follows intensified high-level engagement between both governments. In recent discussions, the U.S. President identified trade as a principal priority, committing to accelerate negotiations and reaffirm previous undertakings. The Department of Trade Negotiations within Thailand’s Ministry of Commerce has confirmed that technical-level discussions between Thailand and the United States are currently underway, with the 19% tariff rate on Thai goods remaining in effect. However, the resumption of technical-level dialogue indicates that future adjustments may be possible, underscoring the importance for businesses to remain vigilant and prepared.

Furthermore, the Thai Minister of Commerce reported that during her meeting with the U.S.–ASEAN Business Council (USABC), American companies and USABC members consistently advocated for both governments to expedite trade negotiations to unlock additional commercial and investment opportunities. Accelerated progress would benefit U.S. companies operating in Thailand, Thai exporters, and American consumers by facilitating access to high-quality products at competitive prices. This is particularly significant for sectors where the United States maintains import dependency, including Thai jasmine rice and other agricultural commodities, as well as broader manufacturing and supply-chain operations connected to Thailand.

The development has been characterized as an encouraging indication that the U.S. administration shares Thailand’s commitment to strengthening economic relations through a stable and predictable trade and taxation framework, notwithstanding broader geopolitical considerations. According to the Minister, such a framework would support sustainable growth in bilateral trade and investment while providing enhanced certainty for cross-border business planning.

Implications for Investment Structuring and Risk Management

The renewed trade engagement between Thailand and the United States necessitates a reassessment of existing investment structures and contractual arrangements. Export-oriented enterprises and operations integrated into U.S.-linked supply chains should evaluate corporate structures, transfer pricing mechanisms, and long-term commercial agreements to ensure continued operational efficiency under both the current tariff regime and potential future modifications. Strategic legal and tax planning can assist investors in mitigating compliance and cost-related risks while maintaining flexibility to capitalize on more favorable trade conditions as negotiations advance.

Conclusion

These developments represent a favorable outlook for investors and businesses with exposure to Thai–U.S. trade relations. Renewed momentum in bilateral negotiations reinforces confidence in Thailand as a strategic trade and investment destination while emphasizing the critical importance of proactive legal and regulatory planning. Investors, importers, exporters, and multinational corporations are advised to monitor these negotiations closely, as forthcoming developments regarding tariffs, trade regulations, and approval processes may directly impact investment structures, operational costs, and market access opportunities.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Burden of Proof in Credit Card Fraud: A Landmark Thai Supreme Court Ruling

The Thai Supreme Court has reaffirmed a critical principle in credit card fraud cases: the burden of proof rests with the issuing bank, not the cardholder. This represents a departure from the general rule that the party asserting a claim bears the burden of proof. In doing so, the Court has clarified the allocation of risk between consumers and financial institutions in disputes involving unauthorized credit card transactions. Supreme Court Judgment No. 2624/2568 establishes an important precedent on liability for unauthorized credit card transactions and significantly strengthens consumer protection under Thai law.

Case Summary

This case arose from a claim filed by the issuing bank alleging that the cardholder failed to make payment on multiple outstanding debts arising from credit card transactions recorded under the cardholder’s account.

The cardholder consistently maintained that the credit card had not been used for the transactions recorded on the dates specified by the issuing bank. The cardholder further asserted that the credit card information had been unlawfully obtained and misused by a third party, as evidenced by a clear discrepancy between the signature appearing on the transaction records and the cardholder’s actual signature. The matter was subsequently reported to the inquiry officer.

man in gray sweater holding black smartphone

In the court of first instance, the cardholder was ordered to pay the outstanding debt. On appeal, although both parties sought review of the judgment, the Court of Appeal upheld the cardholder’s liability and increased the amount payable, declining to consider the defense of unauthorized use on the grounds that it had not been properly raised before the Court of First Instance.

The Supreme Court reversed the lower courts’ rulings, holding that the burden of proof properly rested with the issuing bank, given its superior control over credit card security measures and specialized expertise in transaction authorization systems. As the issuing bank failed to discharge this burden, the claim was dismissed and the cardholder was found not liable. The Court further noted that both the issuing bank and the merchant bore partial responsibility for failing to conduct adequate verification and to implement appropriate preventive measures.

The Burden of Proof Issue

Once credit card fraud is alleged, the key issue is whether the credit card system issued by the bank was sufficiently secure against copying or counterfeiting, and consequently, which party bears the burden of proof.

The Supreme Court held that matters relating to credit card security concern manufacturing, design, and operational processes that fall within the issuing bank’s specific knowledge and control. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 29 of the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008), the burden of proof rests with the issuing bank.

In this case, the issuing bank failed to adduce technical or expert evidence demonstrating the adequacy of its credit card security system. Moreover, evidence showed that other cardholders had lodged similar complaints involving counterfeit cards. As a result, the issuing bank failed to discharge its burden of proof.

Key Impact on the Consumer Protection Sector

1. Shift of the Burden of Proof

The burden of proof is shifted from the cardholder to the issuing bank, as the issuing bank possesses specialized knowledge and expertise in credit card systems and transaction security. Accordingly, cardholders are not required to prove technical matters beyond their reasonable capacity.

2. Enhancement of Bank Security Standards

Following this judgment, issuing banks are required to substantiate claims regarding system security with concrete technical evidence, rather than relying solely on general assertions or internal standards.

3. Promotion of Consumer Confidence

The judgment reinforces consumer protection based on principles of fairness, enhances public confidence in digital financial systems, and supports broader economic activity.

4. Precedent Value

This judgment establishes an important precedent affirming that issuing banks are responsible for implementing effective fraud prevention measures and ensuring the security of credit card systems. Future disputes involving credit card fraud may rely on this judgment in assessing bank liability.

Conclusion

Thai Supreme Court Judgment No. 2624/2568 marks a significant advancement in consumer protection law by placing the evidentiary burden on issuing banks in cases involving electronic payment fraud. The judgment reinforces fairness in the assessment of contractual obligations, strengthens protection for cardholders, and places increased pressure on financial institutions to enhance their security, authentication, and fraud monitoring systems.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

DBD Intensifies Crackdown on Illegal Businesses: Public Urged to Avoid Nominee Arrangements and Mule Accounts

As of December 2025, the Department of Business Development (DBD)’s Division for the Prevention and Suppression of Illegal Businesses continues to ramp up its efforts to combat unlawful practices, particularly the use of nominee shareholders and juristic person mule accounts. Following the Division’s establishment in October 2025 and the subsequent rollout of stricter measures, the public and business operators are strongly advised to strictly comply with Thai laws to avoid severe legal consequences.

The DBD has emphasized that certain high-risk groups must exercise extra caution when involved in company registrations or shareholding. Registering a company or holding shares in circumstances that raise red flags—such as links to suspicious networks or lack of genuine business intent—can lead to suspicions of acting as a nominee or facilitating mule accounts, both of which are serious violations.

Furthermore, the Department is closely monitoring cases where companies appear to lack real operational substance, such as those without proper financial trails, active business activities, or verifiable capital sources. Foreign nationals or entities attempting to control Thai companies through hidden ownership structures are particularly at risk of investigation.

In cases where discrepancies arise—such as mismatches between reported shareholders and actual control, or unusual transaction patterns—companies and individuals involved may be required to clarify their positions promptly. Failure to demonstrate legitimate business operations could result in legal action, including fines, company dissolution, or criminal charges.

The DBD reiterates that nominee arrangements, where Thai nationals hold shares on behalf of foreigners to bypass foreign ownership restrictions, undermine economic fairness and national security. Similarly, registering juristic persons primarily to open bank accounts for fraudulent purposes erodes public trust and facilitates crime.

To protect yourself and ensure compliance:

  • If you are a shareholder or director, actively participate in the company’s operations and maintain proper records.
  • Avoid agreeing to hold shares or register companies on behalf of others without a full understanding and genuine involvement.
  • Businesses should regularly review their structures for transparency and report any suspicious approaches immediately.

The Division is committed to fostering a transparent and equitable business environment. Violations not only harm the economy but also carry heavy penalties. Citizens are encouraged to correct any irregular arrangements voluntarily and seek guidance from the DBD to align with the law.

For our earlier article on the establishment of the Division, refer to https://thelegal.co.th/2025/10/14/department-of-business-development-establishes-division-to-combat-illegal-business-practices/ : Department of Business Development Establishes Division to Combat Illegal Business Practices.

Related Article: https://thelegal.co.th/2025/10/14/department-of-business-development-establishes-division-to-combat-illegal-business-practices/

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles