Tag: Commercial

on by

Online Platform: ETDA’s Push for New Rules on Social Commerce to Safeguard Thai Consumers

In a move to tighten oversight on digital marketplaces, Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) is gearing up to introduce new regulations targeting social commerce platforms. This initiative aims to close loopholes in consumer protection, ensuring that online transactions meet stringent standards amid the growing popularity of buying and selling via social media. The announcement comes as platforms like Facebook argue they fall outside traditional e-commerce definitions, prompting ETDA to expand its regulatory net.

The backdrop for these changes is rooted in Thailand’s evolving digital economy. With e-commerce booming, the existing Electronic Transactions Committee’s announcement—set to take effect on December 31, 2025—already mandates that e-commerce platforms sell or advertise products adhering to standards from the Thai Industrial Standards Institute (TISI) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, social media giants such as Facebook have claimed exemption, citing the absence of integrated payment systems and separate user accounts for transactions. ETDA has countered this, stating, “Facebook has informed ETDA that they do not fall under the category. We are therefore preparing a new announcement to cover Facebook, as it cannot be denied that Facebook is widely used as a platform for buying and selling goods known as social commerce, which requires strict product standards.”

This conciliatory approach by ETDA also considers international trade dynamics, particularly U.S. policies under President Donald Trump, which threaten trade retaliation against countries restricting American platforms. By avoiding overly restrictive measures, Thailand seeks to balance consumer safety with open trade, preventing potential barriers for U.S.-based companies operating in the region.

Beyond social commerce, the new rules will extend to space-sharing platforms like Airbnb. ETDA plans to enforce standards for user safety, identity verification, and tenant rights, addressing common issues such as leaks or power outages. Additionally, concerns over monopolistic practices in delivery services—previously requiring platforms to offer at least three shipping options—have been shifted to the Trade Competition Commission (TCC) for handling and streamlining regulatory responsibilities.

These developments underscore Thailand’s commitment to fostering a secure digital ecosystem. As social commerce continues to thrive, with platforms blending social interaction and shopping, the need for robust oversight has become evident. ETDA’s efforts aim not only to protect consumers from substandard or unsafe products but also to promote fair competition and innovation in the online space.

Key Takeaways:

Future Implications: This could set a precedent for more comprehensive digital platform governance in Thailand, boosting trust in online transactions.

Expanded Regulation: ETDA’s new announcement will include social commerce platforms like Facebook, requiring them to enforce product standards from TISI and the FDA to plug consumer protection gaps.

Consumer Focus: The rules prioritize Thai buyers’ safety by mandating quality controls on goods sold online, effective from late 2025 onward.

International Considerations: A balanced approach avoids trade conflicts with the U.S., aligning with global digital trade norms.

Broader Scope: Space-sharing services like Airbnb will face new safety and rights standards, while delivery monopolies fall under TCC jurisdiction.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Updated Regulation on Official Secrets: Modernization, Electronic Security Measures, and Comparison with International Standards

On 30 December 2025, the Thai Cabinet approved in principle the draft Regulation on the Protection of Official Secrets (No. ..) B.E. …., as proposed by the Office of the Permanent Secretary to the Prime Minister. This revision updates the framework established in B.E. 2544 (2001), primarily to address the increasing reliance on electronic systems in government operations and resolve limitations in handling classified information digitally.

Background and Rationale:

The original regulation, enacted pursuant to Section 16 of the Official Information Act, B.E. 2540 (1997), mandated measures to prevent leakage of official secrets. It detailed procedures for classification, copying, translation, transfer, transmission, disclosure, destruction, storage, backup, and security, but focused predominantly on paper-based documents.

With the widespread adoption of electronic systems, agencies faced operational delays when handling classified information, often reverting to paper methods for compliance. This practice conflicted with the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on Administrative Correspondence (No. 4), B.E. 2564 (2021), which promotes electronic administration.

The need for reform was identified as early as the Official Information Board No. 2/2554 meeting in March 2011, leading to the formation of a sub-committee. The revised draft, endorsed by the Board in its no. 2/2568 meeting on 28 October 2025, was subsequently submitted to the Cabinet.

Key Amendments: Electronic Classified Information

The primary enhancement is the introduction of Chapter 5: Electronic Classified Information, comprising 26 new provisions (Sections 50/1 to 50/26). These establish comprehensive guidelines for digital management of classified data, covering:

•  Classification and marking of electronic documents.

•  Procedures for creation, copying, translation, transfer, transmission, receipt, and disclosure via digital channels.

•  Secure storage, backup, and recovery to mitigate loss or unauthorised destruction.

•  Cybersecurity measures, including encryption, access controls, and system auditing.

•  Protocols for secure destruction of electronic classified information when no longer needed.

These provisions aim to facilitate efficient inter-agency coordination and public service delivery while preserving confidentiality.

Expected Benefits:

By providing clear protocols for electronic transmission, the regulation enhances administrative speed and aligns secrecy practices with modern information technology. It supports digital transformation in public administration without compromising national security or obligations under the Official Information Act, B.E. 2540 (1997).

Next Steps:

The Cabinet has directed submission of the draft to the Committee for the Scrutiny of Draft Legislation and Subordinate Legislation Proposed to the Cabinet. This review will incorporate observations from entities such as the Office of the Public Sector Development Commission, the Office of the Council of State, the Digital Government Development Agency, the National Economic and Social Development Council, and the National Security Council. Formal promulgation will follow upon completion.

Comparison with International Standards:

Thailand’s revisions demonstrate strong alignment with global best practices in electronic handling of classified information, which universally emphasize encryption, access controls, auditing, and secure storage.

•  United States: Executive Order 13526 and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 offer detailed, risk-based controls across multiple families (e.g., Access Control, System and Communications Protection). Thailand’s provisions mirror these in core areas but are less granular.

•  European Union: Council Decision 2013/488/EU requires approved cryptography for higher classifications and comprehensive information assurance. Thailand parallels this in transmission and storage requirements.

•  United Kingdom: The Official Secrets Act 1989 (as amended) and related policies incorporate encryption and secure systems, with recent enhancements under the National Security Act 2023 addressing contemporary threats.

•  ISO/IEC 27001: This standard mandates risk-based information classification and controls for transfer and protection. Thailand’s government-specific rules complement this approach.

Similarities include mandates for encrypted transmission, restricted access, secure storage, and audited destruction. Differences lie in depth: international frameworks like NIST provide extensive, customizable controls and certification requirements, whereas Thailand’s update remains procedurally focused on administrative adaptation.

Overall, this reform represents a commendable advancement toward international convergence, bolstering Thailand’s digital governance while upholding robust confidentiality safeguards. Further enhancements could involve adopting more detailed risk-based mechanisms and independent certification processes observed in mature systems.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Bank of Thailand Proposes Stricter Documentation Requirements for Inbound Foreign Exchange Transactions

In addition to the proposed increase in the foreign income repatriation threshold under the Bank of Thailand’s relaxations to foreign exchange regulations (as outlined in our previous article, Proposed Relaxations to Foreign Exchange Regulations), the Bank of Thailand (“BOT”) has proposed measures to strengthen regulatory oversight of inbound foreign exchange transactions. These measures aim to mitigate appreciation pressure on the Thai Baht, enhance transaction transparency, and prevent the inflow of funds inconsistent with their declared sources or otherwise undesirable.

The BOT has launched a public consultation on the Draft Notification on Rules and Procedures for Foreign Exchange Transactions (Draft Rules on Verification of Inbound Foreign Exchange Transactions). The consultation period runs from 30 December 2025 to 16 January 2026, with feedback informing the final regulatory framework.

Current Regulatory Framework

Under existing rules:

  • Foreign currency may be brought into Thailand without amount limitation for conversion into Thai Baht or deposit into a foreign currency deposit (“FCD”) account.
  • Transaction participants are required only to declare the source of funds.
  • No supporting documentary evidence is currently required.

Rationale for the Draft Rules

The proposed amendments are intended to:

  • Enhance scrutiny of inbound foreign exchange transactions and align inbound controls with outbound foreign exchange rules, under which purchases or transfers of foreign currency of USD 200,000 or more (or equivalent) are subject to documentary verification unless Know Your Business (“KYB”) procedures have been applied.
  • Increase transparency in foreign exchange transactions.
  • Prevent misrepresentation of fund sources and the use of inbound transactions for non-genuine or undesirable purposes.
  • Mitigate appreciation pressure on the Thai Baht by moderating demand arising from inbound foreign exchange transactions through enhanced verification and documentation requirements.

Key Features of the Draft Rules

While inbound foreign exchange transactions remain unrestricted in terms of amount, the Draft Rules propose stricter documentary verification requirements, differentiated by the type of licensed service provider.

1. Transactions Conducted Through Commercial Banks

A. Transactions of USD 200,000 or More (or equivalent)

Commercial banks are required to verify supporting documents corresponding to the declared source of funds on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

Exception: Documentary verification may be waived for routine transactions of business customers that are well known to the bank and subject to ongoing KYB and Customer Due Diligence (“CDD”) processes.

B. Certain High-Risk Inbound Transactions

For inbound transactions that may be used for non-business-related purposes or where the source of funds is unclear, commercial banks would be required to obtain supporting documentation on a transaction-by-transaction basis, even if the customer has already undergone KYC/KYB procedures. Such transactions include, but are not limited to:

  • Proceeds from the sale of real estate
  • Proceeds from the sale of digital assets
  • Capital inflows other than direct investment or securities investment
  • Other income sources that cannot be clearly identified

C. Digital Asset-Related Proceeds

Where foreign currency is derived from the sale of digital assets, banks must additionally obtain documents evidencing either:

  • The source of the digital assets, or
  • The source of funds used to acquire such digital assets.

2. Transactions Conducted Through Non-Bank Operators

A. Transactions of USD 200,000 or More (or equivalent)

Non-bank operators would be required to verify supporting documents corresponding to the declared source of funds for every transaction, without exception.

B. Digital Asset-Related Proceeds

Supporting documents evidencing the source of the digital assets or the funds used to acquire such assets must be obtained in all cases.

C. Inbound Cash Transactions Exceeding USD 15,000 (or equivalent)

Non-bank operators must obtain the customs declaration evidencing that the cash was declared to Thai Customs authorities upon entry into Thailand.

Potential Impacts

  • High-value transaction participants and business operators not subject to ongoing KYB processes, or whose transactions fall within categories requiring enhanced scrutiny, may face increased compliance burdens, particularly in preparing and submitting supporting documentation.
  • Commercial banks and non-bank operators will bear additional compliance and operational responsibilities in verifying documents and ensuring adherence to the enhanced regulatory standards.

Conclusion

The Draft Rules represent a clear move toward stricter verification of inbound foreign exchange transactions, particularly for high-value transfers and funds derived from digital assets or non-traditional sources. Although inbound transactions remain unrestricted in amount, documentation requirements will increase significantly. Market participants should review their transaction structures and supporting documentation in advance to ensure readiness once the rules are finalized.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

In-Principle Cabinet Approval of Thailand’s 2025 Permanent Residence Quota: Strengthening Long-Term Investment Confidence

The Thai Cabinet has granted in-principle approval to the Draft Notification of the Office of the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Interior on the Determination of the Annual Quota of Foreign Nationals Eligible for Permanent Residence in Thailand for B.E. 2568 (2025), as proposed by the Ministry of Interior. This development holds particular significance for the business and investment communities, as it enhances regulatory certainty for foreign investors seeking long-term stability and lawful residence in Thailand, especially given the substantial contribution of foreign investment to the Thai economy.

While Section 40 of the Immigration Act B.E. 2522 (1979) prescribes the maximum number of foreign nationals eligible for permanent residence, this provision merely establishes a statutory ceiling. A separate annual notification is required to formally determine and activate the quota for each calendar year, thereby enabling lawful approvals under Section 41 of the Immigration Act B.E. 2522 (1979).

Annual Quota for Permanent Residence for B.E. 2568 (2025)

  • Up to 100 persons per nationality
  • Colonies of any country, or territories with autonomous administration, shall be treated collectively as one nationality
  • Up to 50 stateless persons

Key Implications for Business and Investment Sectors

1. Annual Quota Determination Process
The permanent residence quota is determined annually based on prevailing demand, subject to the statutory maximum prescribed under Section 40 of the Immigration Act B.E. 2522 (1979).

2. Enhanced Strategic Workforce Planning
Clearly defined annual quotas enable businesses to plan immigration strategies for foreign employees and key personnel more effectively and with greater foresight.

3. Workforce Stability and Talent Retention
A structured pathway to permanent residence facilitates the retention of qualified foreign professionals and minimizes immigration-related operational disruptions.

4. Investment Confidence and Risk Mitigation
Cabinet-level approval of the annual quota reinforces regulatory legitimacy and reduces uncertainty for investors making long-term capital commitments in Thailand.

5. Economic Ecosystem Development
Strengthening Thailand’s appeal as a long-term destination for foreign nationals indirectly supports ancillary sectors including real estate, education, healthcare, and lifestyle industries.

Conclusion

Thailand’s annual permanent residence quota operates within a structured statutory framework under the Immigration Act B.E. 2522 (1979), providing regulatory clarity and predictability for foreign nationals, businesses, and investors seeking long-term establishment in the Kingdom. This systematic approach strengthens investor confidence and reinforces Thailand’s position as a regional hub for sustained investment and high-skilled talent acquisition.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Thailand’s Top-up Tax Regime: Aligning Domestic Law with OECD Global Minimum Tax Standards

Overview of Thailand’s Top-up Tax Regime

Following the enactment of the Emergency Decree on Top-up Tax, B.E. 2567 (2024) (the “Emergency Decree“), Thailand has established a global minimum tax regime aligned with international tax reform initiatives. The Emergency Decree applies to large multinational enterprise groups (MNEs) with consolidated financial statement revenues of at least EUR 750 million (or the Thai Baht equivalent).

Under the Emergency Decree, in-scope MNEs are subject to a 15% global minimum effective tax rate on their profits through the imposition of a top-up tax. This mechanism ensures that profits are taxed at a minimum level, regardless of the jurisdiction in which they are earned. The Emergency Decree took effect for accounting periods commencing on or after 1 January B.E. 2568 (2025), marking a significant development in Thailand’s international tax framework and its alignment with the global minimum tax standards endorsed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Draft Secondary Legislation

On 30 December B.E. 2568 (2025), the Cabinet approved in principle four draft items of secondary legislation (the “Draft Secondary Legislation“) issued pursuant to the Emergency Decree. The Draft Secondary Legislation sets out detailed rules governing the determination of multinational enterprise groups subject to the top-up tax and the adjustment of income, expenses, and covered taxes for calculating the top-up tax.

The Draft Secondary Legislation has been developed with reference to the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Model Rules, the related Commentary, and the Administrative Guidance issued by the OECD. The four draft items of secondary legislation are as follows:

  1. Draft Royal Decree prescribing the criteria for determining the applicability of the top-up tax to multinational enterprise groups that have undergone organizational restructuring, B.E. ….;
  2. Draft Royal Decree prescribing entities that are not regarded as constituent entities, B.E. ….;
  3. Draft Ministerial Regulation No. .. (B.E. ….), issued pursuant to the Emergency Decree, concerning the allocation of residual top-up tax received by Thailand to constituent entities located in Thailand; and
  4. Draft Ministerial Regulation No. .. (B.E. ….), issued pursuant to the Emergency Decree, concerning adjustments to income, expenses, and covered taxes for calculating the top-up tax.

Applicable Stakeholders to the Emergency Decree and Draft Secondary Legislation

Scope of Application

The Emergency Decree, together with the Draft Secondary Legislation, applies to all constituent entities (CEs) located in Thailand that are members of an MNE group whose ultimate parent entity has consolidated revenues equal to or exceeding EUR 750 million (or the Thai Baht equivalent) in at least two of the four preceding fiscal years.

Organizational Restructuring

MNEs should plan in advance for organizational restructuring activities, including mergers and acquisitions, demergers, and intra-group transfers of assets, as such restructuring arrangements cannot be used to circumvent the top-up tax.

Investment Promotion Incentives

MNEs that have received investment promotion incentives from the Thailand Board of Investment (BOI) are exempt from corporate income tax (CIT); however, such incentives do not exempt them from the top-up tax. Where the effective tax rate falls below 15%, the relevant MNEs are required to pay top-up tax to reach the global minimum effective tax rate.

Tax Planning Requirements

Advance tax planning is essential. Where an MNE has CEs in Thailand, the effective tax rate of each CE should be carefully assessed. Even where the effective tax rate (ETR) exceeds 15% and no top-up tax is payable, GloBE information reporting obligations continue to apply. To ensure compliance with the OECD GloBE Rules, MNEs are advised to consult financial and tax advisors to maintain accurate accounting and tax information.

Reporting and Filing Obligations

All CEs in Thailand are required to electronically submit the following documents to the Thai Revenue Department within 15 months from the end of the relevant accounting period in which the top-up tax is assessed:

  • Notification reporting information relating to the MNE group, details of the constituent entity, and the jurisdiction in which it is located;
  • The GloBE Information Return; and
  • The top-up tax return, together with the payment of the corresponding tax.

Next Steps

The Draft Secondary Legislation issued pursuant to the Emergency Decree is currently undergoing the process for publication in the Royal Gazette. Once officially published, it will become enforceable as secondary legislation, marking the next stage in the implementation of Thailand’s top-up tax regime.

Conclusion

The Emergency Decree and the Draft Secondary Legislation ensure that Thailand’s top-up tax framework is fully aligned with the practices adopted by members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). This approach is expected to significantly reduce base erosion and profit shifting by MNEs at both domestic and international levels while curbing competitive disparities in corporate income taxation. Moreover, it is anticipated to promote sustainable investment in Thailand, balancing fiscal sustainability with a competitive investment environment.

Related Article: Advancing Thailand’s Legal and Regulatory Reform under the OECD Framework – The Legal Co., Ltd.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Tax Obligations and Compliance for Foreign Residents in Thailand

Under Thailand’s taxation framework, foreign individuals residing in the country are subject to specific tax obligations, particularly when they are also liable for taxation in other jurisdictions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the Thai tax system for individuals residing in Thailand for 180 days or more, including the requirements for filing tax returns, allowable deductions, the application of Double Taxation Agreements, and penalties for non-compliance.

Tax Residency and Taxable Income in Thailand:

According to Thai tax law, an individual who resides in Thailand for a cumulative period of 180 days or more within a calendar year (1 January to 31 December) is classified as a “tax resident of Thailand.” Tax residents are subject to Personal Income Tax (PIT) on the following categories of income:

  1. Income Derived from Sources Within Thailand:
Such income is taxable regardless of whether it is paid within Thailand or abroad.
  1. Foreign-Sourced Income:
Such income is subject to Thai PIT if it is earned on or after 1 January 2024 and remitted to Thailand in any year. However, foreign-sourced income earned prior to 1 January 2024 is exempt from Thai PIT, even if remitted to Thailand on or after 1 January 2024.

Tax Return Filing Requirements:

Thai tax residents who earn income from sources within Thailand or who remit foreign-sourced income to Thailand (as described above) are required to file a tax return with the Thai Revenue Department within 31 March of the following year for the preceding calendar year’s income.

Deductions and Allowances:

Not all income is subject to taxation, as certain types of income are exempt, including severance pay up to a specified amount, retirement benefits, and bank interest that has already been withheld at source. Additionally, taxpayers may claim deductions for various expenses based on the type of income received.

Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) and Tax Credits:

To mitigate the risk of double taxation, Thailand has entered into DTAs with various countries. These agreements aim to prevent income from being taxed in both Thailand and the country where it was earned. Foreign residents subject to Thai PIT may be eligible for either a tax exemption or a foreign tax credit, depending on the provisions of the applicable DTAs and the type of income involved.

Penalties for Non-Compliance:

Failure to comply with the above requirements results in fines and surcharges.

Conclusion:

Foreign residents in Thailand who meet the 180-day residency threshold must carefully navigate their tax obligations to ensure compliance with Thai tax law. This includes understanding the scope of taxable income, both from Thai and foreign sources, fulfilling tax return filing requirements, leveraging allowable deductions and DTAs benefits, and adhering to deadlines to avoid penalties. By maintaining accurate records and submitting properly certified documentation, taxpayers can effectively manage their tax liabilities and ensure compliance with the Thai Revenue Department’s regulations. 

Source: International Comparison December 2025: Antea

Read Full Article

on by

Cannabis: Stricter Controls with New Draft Ministerial Regulation

The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) is progressing with a new draft ministerial regulation to impose tighter oversight on cannabis, prioritizing medical applications and consumer safeguards amid a notable decline in commercial outlets.

The draft, titled “Ministerial Regulation on Permits for Research, Export, Sale, or Processing of Controlled Herbs for Commercial Purposes (No. .. ) B.E. ….”, has received Cabinet approval and is undergoing review by the Office of the Council of State prior to final approval.

This update replaces the 2016 regulation, which is deemed insufficient for the evolving cannabis landscape. It introduces targeted mechanisms for commercial export, sale, and processing to safeguard public health and minimize community disruptions.

Principal Requirements Under the Draft Regulation:

•  Restricted Sales Venues: Commercial distribution limited to medical treatment facilities (with physician prescriptions and supervised dispensing), pharmacies, herbal product outlets, or traditional Thai medicine practitioner sites.

•  Staffing Standards: At least one employee certified by the Department of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine must be on duty during business hours.

•  Operational Guidelines: Mandatory efficient systems for odor and smoke elimination to avoid public nuisance; premises must be legally owned or possessed; dedicated storage with controlled temperature, humidity, separation from other items, and no direct floor contact.

•  Transitional Provisions: Current licenses are valid until expiry, but all renewals, new permits, or pre-enactment applications must adhere to the updated standards.

The MOPH has affirmed sufficient qualified medical professionals nationwide to support the framework and guaranteed uninterrupted access for patients requiring cannabis therapeutically through hospital-based prescriptions.

Recent data indicate substantial industry contraction: As of late 2025, 18,433 registered establishments existed nationwide, 8,636 expiring licenses in 2025, only 1,339 (15.5%) were renewed, resulting in over 7,297 closures and an estimated 11,136 remaining. Further expirations are anticipated: 4,587 in 2026 and 5,210 in 2027.

Many operators appear to be closing in anticipation of the elevated compliance thresholds rather than adapting.

Key Takeaways:

•  Medical-Centric Shift: Sales confined to regulated health-related venues, emphasizing prescription-based access over general retail.

•  Mandatory Business Upgrades: Requirements for infrastructure, storage, environmental controls, and trained personnel will challenge existing operators.

•  Industry Downsizing: Thousands of outlets have already closed without renewal, foreshadowing further consolidation.

•  Patient Protections: Therapeutic users assured continued supply via national hospital networks.

•  Implementation Timeline: Final enactment expected soon after review; broader policy direction may vary with future administrations.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Penal Code Amendment (No. 30): Criminalizing Sexual Harassment and Implications for Workplace Policies

On December 30, 2025, the Royal Gazette published the Penal Code Amendment Act (No. 30), B.E. 2568 (2025), marking a significant advancement in Thailand’s legal framework for addressing sexual offenses. This amendment introduces “sexual harassment”  as a distinct criminal offense, refines existing provisions to reflect contemporary societal dynamics, and emphasizes protection for individuals across all genders, ages, and identities. By elevating such acts from minor infractions to criminal liability, the law seeks to deter perpetrators, enhance victim support, and foster a safer society. The changes address limitations in prior legislation, which often treated harassment merely as a petty offense causing annoyance, insufficient for the severity and diversity of modern incidents.

Key Changes Introduced by the Amendment:

The amendment encompasses several pivotal modifications to the Thai Penal Code:

1.  Expanded Definition of “Rape”: The definition is broadened to include emerging forms of sexual violation, ensuring inclusivity for diverse gender identities and modern contexts.

2.  Abolition of the Offense of “Indecent Act by Intrusion”: This provision is repealed to modernize and streamline the legal structure.

3.  Establishment of Sexual Harassment as a Criminal Offense: A new, dedicated section defines sexual harassment broadly as any act—physical, verbal, auditory, gestural, communicative, involving stalking, or conducted via computer systems—with sexual connotations that causes another person distress, annoyance, embarrassment, or a sense of insecurity. This encompasses:

       •  Physical actions or contact.

       •  Verbal remarks, sounds, or displays.

       •  Persistent communication, following, or monitoring.

       •  Digital interactions, such as through emails, social media, or online platforms.

These updates recognize the evolving nature of sexual offenses, including those affecting individuals of all ages, genders, and sexual orientations, and account for the psychological and physical harm inflicted.

Penalties Under the New Provisions:

Penalties are structured progressively to reflect the offense’s severity, context, and impact:

•  General Cases: Imprisonment not exceeding 1 year, a fine not exceeding 20,000 baht, or both.

•  Repeated or Continuous Acts (disrupting the victim’s normal life): Imprisonment not exceeding 2 years, a fine not exceeding 40,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts in Public Places or Via Computer Systems: Imprisonment not exceeding 3 years, a fine not exceeding 60,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts Against Children (under 15 years): Imprisonment not exceeding 5 years, a fine not exceeding 100,000 baht, or both.

•  Acts by Persons in Authority (e.g., supervisors, employers, or those with power over the victim): Imprisonment not exceeding 3 years, a fine not exceeding 60,000 baht, or both.

This graduated approach underscores heightened accountability in cases involving vulnerability, repetition, public exposure, digital means, or power imbalances, particularly relevant in professional settings.

Broader Implications for Society and Business Operations:

The amendment responds to the increasing prevalence and complexity of sexual offenses in Thai society, where traditional laws proved inadequate. By criminalizing a wider array of behaviors, it aims to improve enforcement, provide stronger deterrence, and offer more effective remedies for victims. For businesses, the law has profound implications, especially given the elevated penalties for acts committed by authority figures. Organizations must adapt to avoid criminal liability for individuals, potential vicarious responsibility, reputational harm, or related civil claims.

Businesses, particularly those with employee hierarchies, customer interactions, or digital operations, should undertake the following preparations:

•  Policy Revision and Development: Update or create comprehensive anti-harassment policies that explicitly incorporate the new legal definition, including workplace-specific examples such as inappropriate comments during meetings, unwanted advances by supervisors, or harassing digital messages.

•  Training Initiatives: Implement mandatory, regular training programs for all employees, with specialized sessions for managers highlighting their increased responsibilities and risks under the law.

•  Robust Reporting and Investigation Frameworks: Establish multiple confidential reporting channels (e.g., HR contacts, anonymous hotlines) and impartial investigation procedures with clear timelines, ensuring protection against retaliation.

•  Risk Mitigation Strategies: Conduct assessments in high-exposure areas, such as supervisory roles or public-facing positions, and integrate policy references into employment contracts and handbooks.

•  Victim Support Measures: Provide resources like counseling, accommodations, and legal referrals to support affected individuals.

•  Ongoing Monitoring: Perform annual reviews of policies and maintain detailed records of compliance efforts as evidence of due diligence.

Consultation with legal and human resources experts is recommended to ensure alignment with complementary laws, such as the Labour Protection Act and the Gender Equality Act.

Developing Effective Workplace Harassment Policies:

In light of the amendment, workplace policies must be thorough and proactive. Essential components include:

1.  Precise Definitions and Illustrations: Mirror the statutory definition while providing contextual examples relevant to the organization’s environment.

2.  Comprehensive Scope: Extend coverage to employees, contractors, clients, and visitors, including remote work and work-related events.

3.  Accessible Reporting Mechanisms: Offer diverse, secure options with prompt acknowledgment and anti-retaliation safeguards.

4.  Fair Investigation Processes: Detail impartial, timely procedures involving trained personnel and thorough documentation.

5.  Disciplinary Measures: Outline consequences proportionate to the offense, up to termination, while addressing power dynamics.

6.  Preventive Education: Require ongoing training to promote awareness and cultural change.

7.  Support Services: Ensure access to assistance for complainants and respondents.

8.  Regular Evaluation: Commit to periodic audits and updates in response to legal or societal developments.

Leadership endorsement and cultural commitment are crucial for effective implementation.

Key Takeaways:

•  The 2025 amendment represents a landmark progression in Thailand’s approach to sexual offenses, criminalizing harassment in its various forms and imposing substantial penalties, effective from December 30, 2025.

•  It particularly heightens risks for those in positions of authority, necessitating urgent workplace adaptations.

•  Organizations that prioritize robust policies, training, and procedures will not only achieve compliance but also cultivate safer, more inclusive environments.

•  This reform aligns with global standards for victim protection and societal safety, encouraging proactive measures across all sectors.

•  Employers are advised to stay informed through official sources, such as the Royal Gazette and relevant ministries, for any additional guidance or interpretations. Prompt action will mitigate risks and contribute to a more equitable professional landscape in Thailand.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

TISA Update – Government Responds to Industry Backlash with+ Proposed Reforms for Broader Equity Incentives

In a follow-up to our earlier publication, “Tax: Understanding TISA – Thailand’s New Tax-Incentivized Individual Savings Account for Thai Equities” (Tax: Understanding TISA – New Tax-Incentivized Individual Savings Account for Thai Equities – The Legal Co., Ltd.), which outlined the initial framework for the Thailand Individual Savings Account (TISA) as a promising tool to channel household savings into domestic equities amid Cabinet approval on December 9, 2025, recent developments reveal significant industry skepticism and swift governmental pledges for revisions. Just two days after the Economic Cabinet’s endorsement, Finance Ministry officials have announced plans to refine the scheme, addressing core criticisms that it lacks genuine incentives for stock investments, imposes tax traps on high earners, and fails to deliver structural market reforms. These adjustments aim to balance equity for low- and middle-income savers while restoring appeal for affluent investors, potentially injecting up to 1 trillion baht annually into the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET).

The backlash, led by analysts and echoed across financial media, highlighted TISA’s resemblance to outdated Long-Term Equity Funds (LTFs) rather than transformative models like Japan’s NISA or the UK’s ISA. Critics argued that the 800,000-baht aggregate tax deduction cap—encompassing TISA, Retirement Mutual Funds (RMF), Super Savings Funds (SSF), Thai ESG Funds (TESG), and other vehicles—disproportionately benefits only 15.9% of Thais who pay personal income tax (PIT), while the proposed income-tiered multipliers (1.3x for earners below 1.5 million baht annually, versus 0.7x for those above) could effectively raise taxes for high-net-worth individuals, deterring their participation as the market’s primary liquidity providers.

Addressing Key Criticisms: Proposed Amendments to Enhance Appeal:

Later on, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister convened stakeholders at the Ministry of Finance to review feedback, emphasizing that the contentious multipliers and income thresholds remain “preliminary models” subject to recalibration for fairness and efficacy. “We are not locking in any figures that could distort incentives or penalize savers; our goal is permanent, flexible long-term savings without the renewal uncertainties of past schemes like LTFs,” underscoring the scheme’s role in the “Quick Big Win” policy’s fifth pillar to combat Thailand’s declining savings rate (from 27% to 25% of GDP over the past decade) ahead of full aging society status.

Key proposed tweaks include:

1.  Refined Income-Tiered Deductions

       •  The 1.3x multiplier for sub-1.5 million baht earners (capping deductions at 1.04 million baht for 800,000-baht investments) will be retained to empower 11.4 million low- and middle-income households, but the 0.7x cap for higher earners (limiting them to 560,000 baht) is under review. Officials signal potential equalization to 1x across brackets or a graduated scale to avoid “tax traps,” ensuring high earners—who contribute over 60% of PIT revenue—retain motivation without subsidizing fiscal shortfalls exceeding 40 billion baht annually from prior incentives.

2.  Expanded Flexibility in Investments and Portfolios

       •  Unlike rigid predecessors, TISA will permit self-directed asset allocation across SET-listed stocks, bonds, ETFs, and mutual funds, with intra-account switches allowed without voiding deductions, provided a minimum five-year hold (or until age 55 for retirement-linked portions). This addresses complaints of a 55-year lock-in as overly restrictive, introducing up to 25% collateralization for emergency loans to enhance liquidity.

       •  A new 200,000-baht annual tranche, separate from the deduction cap, will exempt dividends, interest, and capital gains from tax—mirroring NISA’s success in boosting Japan’s investment-to-deposit ratio from 17% to 23.6% over a decade—directly countering the “no real return exemptions” critique.

3.  ESG and Thematic Boosters

       •  The 1.2x deduction multiplier for TESG investments remains, but with broadened eligibility to high-ESG or governance-scoring stocks, encouraging sustainable flows without mandating funds. This aligns with the SET’s Jump+ reforms, potentially channeling 100-200 billion baht yearly into green and blue economy sectors.

4.  Complementary Measures for Market Depth

       •  Parallel initiatives include monthly 1,000-million-baht issuances of “Savings Plus” government bonds (minimum 1,000 baht, app-based with full liquidity) and micro-insurance stamp duty exemptions to lower entry barriers. The Office of Insurance Commission (OIC) will also cut risk charges on equity investments from 25% to 18%, freeing up 100 billion baht annually from insurers for SET inflows.

These revisions, slated for Cabinet submission by late December 2025, target a July 1, 2026, rollout for the 2026 tax year, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) finalizing eligible assets.

What Stakeholders Should Prepare for in the Revised Framework:

1. Individual Investors and High-Net-Worth Clients

•  Model 2025-2026 tax scenarios incorporating potential 1x equalization and the 200,000-baht exemption tranche; prioritize dividend-yield stocks (e.g., banking sector at 5-7%) for tax-free income.

•  Stress-test portfolios for five-year horizons with switch flexibility, using the 25% loan collateral as a safety net.

2. Financial Institutions and Brokerage Firms

•  Upgrade platforms for dynamic TISA tracking, including multiplier calculations and exemption reporting; prepare for a surge in retail accounts (targeting 5-10 million users initially).

•  Collaborate on educational webinars to demystify self-directed options, focusing on ESG to capture the 1.2x premium.

3. Listed Companies and Investor Relations Teams

•  Accelerate ESG disclosures and dividend policies to qualify for incentives, anticipating 20-30% retail ownership growth; leverage TISA for targeted retail roadshows.

4. Tax Practitioners and Certified Financial Planners

•  Integrate TISA into holistic plans, phasing out expiring ThaiESG limits (down to 100,000 baht by 2027); advise on the new child investment exemptions under Section 40(4) to enable intergenerational wealth transfer.

Key Takeaways:

•  TISA’s initial design drew valid industry fire for weak stock incentives and high-earner disincentives, but December 11 announcements signal responsive tweaks toward NISA-like exemptions and flexibility, preserving the 800,000-baht cap while adding a 200,000-baht tax-free layer.

•  Reforms prioritize low-income access (1.3x deductions) but eye balanced multipliers to sustain high-earner flows, potentially averting market liquidity dips and injecting 500 billion-1 trillion baht yearly into equities.

•  With Cabinet review imminent and 2026 implementation on track, stakeholders must adapt swiftly: recalibrate models, enhance platforms, and educate on self-directed perks to capitalize on this pivot toward enduring savings culture.

•  Beyond TISA, holistic reforms—like monetary easing and governance upgrades akin to Japan’s “three arrows”—remain essential for true market revitalization.

This evolving TISA framework could yet emerge as a game-changer, fostering inclusive long-term investing if revisions temper fiscal conservatism with bold incentives. Early movers in compliant portfolios and advisory services will reap the rewards of Thailand’s maturing capital markets.

Related Article: Tax: Understanding TISA – New Tax-Incentivized Individual Savings Account for Thai Equities – The Legal Co., Ltd.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Advancing Thailand’s Legal and Regulatory Reform under the OECD Framework

On 2 December 2025, the Cabinet acknowledged a progress report on Thailand’s legal and regulatory development under the cooperation framework with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Since 2018, Thailand has engaged in cooperation with the OECD through the Country Programme, with the objective of enhancing the effectiveness, transparency, and overall quality of its legal and regulatory framework. The Office of the Council of State (OCS) serves as the principal authority responsible for driving legal reform and promoting Good Regulatory Practices in Thailand.

Evolution of Thailand’s Legal and Regulatory Reform under the OECD Country Programme

Phase I of the Country Programme

During the first phase of the Country Programme, Thailand focused on establishing the institutional and legal foundations for good regulatory governance by aligning domestic practices with OECD standards. Key developments included:

  • The adoption of OECD good regulatory practices to support the implementation of the Act on Legislative Drafting and Evaluation of Law B.E. 2562 (2019); and
  • The implementation of capacity-building initiatives, including training programmes for government officials, to enhance regulatory quality and institutional effectiveness.

Phase II of the Country Programme

During the second phase of the Country Programme, the focus shifted toward enhancing regulatory quality to address emerging economic and social challenges, with particular emphasis on reducing regulatory burdens on citizens and businesses. Key areas of cooperation during this phase included:

  • The joint implementation of projects between Thailand and the OECD aimed at modernising the legal and regulatory framework;
  • The adoption of measures designed to reduce both the cost of living and the cost of doing business; and
  • The introduction of proportionality principles into Thailand’s regulatory impact analysis (RIA) framework to ensure that regulatory measures are commensurate with their intended objectives and impacts.

Overview of the OECD Assessment

The OECD assessment provides a comprehensive evaluation of Thailand’s regulatory policy framework, encompassing existing laws and regulations, institutional arrangements, governance structures, and regulatory instruments. It examines both ex-ante and ex-post regulatory impact assessments, as well as mechanisms for stakeholder consultation and engagement.

OECD Recommendations for Strengthening Thailand’s Regulatory System

The OECD proposes 15 key recommendations aimed at strengthening Thailand’s legal and regulatory framework and enhancing overall regulatory quality:

  1. Promote evidence-based policymaking – Systematically integrate RIA into policymaking processes at all levels and strengthen stakeholder engagement.
  2. Enhance transparency and accountability – Improve public reporting on the quality of RIAs and the conduct of public consultations.
  3. Share regulatory best practices – Encourage knowledge-sharing and peer learning among agencies with strong regulatory performance.
  4. Reinforce the role of the Office of the Council of State – Designate it as the central authority responsible for regulatory quality oversight and standard-setting.
  5. Build policy analysis capacity – Develop multidisciplinary competencies within the public sector, including economics, data analytics, and policy evaluation.
  6. Improve RIA and consultation guidelines – Establish clear and consistent standards regarding the evidence required for regulatory assessments.
  7. Initiate RIA at an early stage – Consider a range of policy options and define clear, measurable objectives from the outset.
  8. Introduce forward regulatory planning – Prioritize high-impact legislation and optimize the allocation of limited regulatory resources.
  9. Ensure ministerial accountability – Require formal ministerial sign-off on RIA summaries to reinforce responsibility for regulatory decisions.
  10. Clarify the timing of stakeholder consultations – Promote early engagement during the problem-definition stage of policy development.
  11. Extend public consultation periods – Increase consultation timelines in line with OECD good regulatory practices.
  12. Enhance the use of the central legal portal – Develop it into a two-way platform that supports transparency and facilitates public feedback.
  13. Review laws based on their impact – Allocate review resources strategically to maximize regulatory effectiveness and outcomes.
  14. Mandate post-enactment reviews – Ensure systematic and regular reviews of high-impact laws and regulations.
  15. Develop a whole-of-government regulatory delivery policy – Integrate risk-based regulation, targeted enforcement, and effective inter-agency coordination.

Implementation Approach for Thailand

Thailand will implement the OECD recommendations through a combination of short-term and long-term measures aimed at strengthening the effective enforcement of the Act on Legislative Drafting and Law Evaluation B.E. 2562 (2019).

Short-Term Actions

Short-term efforts will focus on planning, prioritization, and capacity-building, including:

  • The introduction of forward regulatory planning and enhanced public disclosure;
  • The prioritization of high-impact laws and regulations;
  • Improvements to public consultation processes; and
  • Training programs on good regulatory practices for relevant public officials.

Long-Term Actions

Long-term reforms will aim to strengthen analytical capacity and institutional oversight mechanisms, including:

  • The adoption of advanced regulatory impact assessment methodologies;
  • Stronger linkages between pre-enactment and post-enactment evaluations;
  • The establishment of dedicated regulatory support units; and
  • Enhanced transparency, monitoring, and reporting of regulatory outcomes.

Conclusion

The OECD assessment and recommendations provide a clear and coherent roadmap for further strengthening Thailand’s legal and regulatory system. Through the systematic and effective implementation of these 15 recommendations, Thailand can significantly enhance regulatory quality, transparency, accountability, and stakeholder participation.

These reforms will contribute to a more effective and responsive regulatory environment that supports sustainable economic and social development, while further aligning Thailand’s governance framework with OECD international standards and good regulatory practices.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles