Tag: Corporate

on by

NBTC Issues AI Governance Guidelines for Telecom Licensees

Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has issued new guidelines setting out its expectations for the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) by telecommunications licensees. Although the guidelines are not legally binding, they establish a comprehensive risk-based framework for AI governance and provide a clear indication of the regulatory standards that the NBTC expects telecom operators to adopt when deploying AI in the provision of telecommunications services.

The guidelines reflect the increasing regulatory focus on AI governance and complement existing legal obligations relating to cybersecurity, personal data protection, and telecommunications. They also align with broader national efforts to develop a comprehensive AI regulatory framework.

Scope of the Guidelines:

The guidelines apply to holders of telecommunications business licenses under Thailand’s telecommunications licensing regime, but only in relation to AI systems used to provide licensed telecommunications services.

Organizations that are not telecommunications licensees are not directly subject to the guidelines. Nevertheless, AI developers, technology vendors, cloud service providers, and outsourced service providers may be indirectly affected because telecommunications licensees are expected to exercise oversight over third-party AI solutions used in their operations. As a result, contractual obligations and vendor due diligence are likely to become increasingly important for suppliers serving the telecommunications sector.

The guidelines should be considered alongside existing legal requirements, including the Personal Data Protection Act, the Cybersecurity Act, the Computer Crime Act, and the NBTC Notification on the Protection of Telecommunications Service Users’ Rights in relation to personal data, privacy, and the freedom of telecommunications. They also complement the broader AI legislation currently under development by the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA).

Strengthening AI Governance:

A central feature of the guidelines is the expectation that AI governance should extend beyond technical implementation and become an organizational responsibility.

Telecommunications licensees are encouraged to establish governance structures at both the policy and operational levels, such as AI committees, working groups, or designated responsible officers. These governance bodies should oversee AI strategy, establish internal policies, supervise risk management, and define accountability throughout the AI lifecycle.

The guidelines also emphasize that responsibilities should be clearly assigned not only to internal personnel but also to third-party AI solution providers and outsourced service providers. Licensees are expected to ensure that contractual arrangements clearly define each party’s obligations regarding AI governance, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

A Principles-Based Approach to Responsible AI:

Rather than prescribing detailed technical requirements, the guidelines adopt a principles-based approach centered on six core expectations.

First, AI systems should comply with applicable laws, ethical principles, and internationally recognized standards. AI should respect privacy, human dignity, and fundamental rights, and organizations should consider implementing appropriate safeguards, including content filtering, to reduce the risk of generating harmful or unlawful outputs.

Second, AI systems should operate fairly. This includes using representative and reliable training data, assessing potential bias, and taking appropriate measures to mitigate discriminatory outcomes.

Third, cybersecurity and privacy protections should be integrated into AI systems. The guidelines encourage the adoption of internationally recognized security standards and recommend technical safeguards such as encryption, anonymization, and access controls to protect personal data and system integrity.

Fourth, organizations should promote transparency by maintaining documentation regarding AI design, development, and operation, while providing consumers with appropriate information about how AI systems influence decisions or recommendations.

Fifth, accountability should be clearly established throughout the organization. Internal policies should define responsibility for AI outcomes, while consumers should have accessible channels to submit inquiries or complaints regarding AI-enabled services.

Finally, AI systems should be reliable and robust. The guidelines recommend testing AI models to ensure that they produce accurate and consistent results, including under unexpected operating conditions.

Governance Throughout the AI Lifecycle:

The guidelines emphasize that AI governance should be integrated throughout the entire AI lifecycle rather than focusing solely on deployment.

Licensees are expected to conduct risk assessments before development begins, evaluate the capabilities and reliability of third-party AI providers, and maintain appropriate standards for data quality and traceability. Before deployment, AI systems should undergo testing for reliability, fairness, and operational performance.

Once AI systems are operational, organizations should continuously monitor performance, maintain appropriate human oversight, and periodically evaluate whether AI systems continue to operate as intended. The guidelines also address the retirement of AI systems, encouraging secure decommissioning processes that protect data and maintain appropriate records throughout the system’s lifecycle.

This lifecycle-based approach reflects the growing international trend toward continuous AI governance rather than one-time compliance assessments.

Consumer Transparency and Organizational Readiness:

Consumer protection is another significant feature of the guidelines.

Telecommunications licensees are encouraged to notify consumers when they are interacting with AI systems, such as chatbots or voicebots. Where AI-generated recommendations may influence consumer decisions, organizations should provide appropriate disclosures and allow consumers to request assistance from a human representative where appropriate. Effective feedback and complaint mechanisms should also be maintained.

Internally, the guidelines recognize that responsible AI governance requires organization-wide awareness. Licensees are therefore encouraged to provide AI-related training across all levels of the organization. Employees who use AI systems should understand the associated legal and operational risks, while technical personnel and external developers should receive training on organizational AI policies, ethical principles, and applicable regulatory requirements.

Practical Implications:

Although the guidelines do not create new legal obligations, they provide valuable insight into the NBTC’s regulatory expectations and are likely to influence future regulatory supervision and industry best practices.

Telecommunications licensees should consider reviewing their existing AI governance frameworks to determine whether governance responsibilities are clearly assigned and appropriately documented. Organizations should also evaluate AI risk management procedures, update contracts with AI vendors and outsourced service providers, assess consumer disclosure mechanisms, and ensure that staff receive appropriate AI governance training.

The guidelines may also have implications for corporate transactions involving telecommunications businesses. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into telecommunications operations, AI governance maturity, data governance practices, and vendor oversight may become important considerations during legal and regulatory due diligence.

Key Takeaways:

  • Telecommunications licensees should review their governance frameworks, contractual arrangements, AI risk management processes, consumer disclosure practices, and staff training programs to align with the NBTC’s expectations.
  • The NBTC’s AI guidelines establish a comprehensive risk-based governance framework for telecommunications licensees and provide a clear indication of the regulator’s expectations for responsible AI deployment.
  • Although nonbinding, the guidelines are likely to influence regulatory supervision and industry best practices within Thailand’s telecommunications sector.
  • AI governance is expected to extend throughout the entire AI lifecycle, encompassing organizational governance, risk management, vendor oversight, cybersecurity, consumer protection, and ongoing monitoring.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Thailand Launches “Economic Cabinet Plus” Plan to Drive High-Growth and High-Income Status

The Thai government has launched a major initiative to work more closely with the private sector on economic policy. Through a new fast-track mechanism and a Joint Public-Private Consultative Committee, the government aims to process private-sector proposals more efficiently and convert business ideas into concrete projects.

What the Government Has Agreed To Do

The initiative’s central aim is to cut red tape and streamline slow-moving bureaucratic processes. The government has established a special fast-track channel that allows economic proposals from business leaders to be reviewed and approved without the delays typical of the traditional system. A newly formed joint public-private committee is then tasked with translating these ideas into implemented projects.

To carry out this plan, the government is driving the economy through four main engines, designed to work in tandem to deliver both short-term and long-term results:

  1. Attracting new investment through a future investment hub and a fast-track approvals initiative aimed at resolving bottlenecks and accelerating project sign-off. The focus is on positioning Thailand as a regional hub for AI, digital technology, and financial services, while advancing the green economy and next-generation automotive industries.
  2. Shifting tourism strategy away from visitor volume and toward high-value, quality tourism — including wellness tourism and medical tourism — while pursuing Free Trade Agreements with major markets such as the EU, the US, and the UK.
  3. Upgrading the national skills base by prioritizing STEM and AI education, and building a stronger ecosystem for startups and private-sector research.
  4. Reforming internal government processes by reducing bureaucratic red tape, expanding digital government and e-licensing services to curb corruption, and updating regulations so that government budgets flow into the economy more quickly.

Under these four engines, the government has identified seven target industries for long-term growth:

  1. High-quality agriculture and food
  2. Future automotive
  3. Smart electronics and digital technology
  4. Medicine and healthcare
  5. High-quality tourism
  6. Global and regional trade
  7. The creative economy

The Government’s Goals

Working in close coordination with the private sector, the government has set measurable targets. First, it aims to raise Thailand’s economic growth potential above 3% annually — a marked improvement on recent performance. Second, it wants to place Thailand among the world’s top 20 most competitive economies, positioning the country as a regional investment hub. The overarching goal of this 12-year plan is to elevate Thailand to “high-income country” status, raising average annual per-capita income to roughly $15,000, up from the current $8,000–$9,000.

What This Means for Investors

For both Thai and foreign investors, the plan offers meaningful advantages. The fast-track system is designed to reduce red tape and shorten approval timelines for licenses and permits. Investors in AI, green energy, digital technology, and financial services — along with the seven target industries — can expect additional support and a more favorable regulatory environment. The government’s 12-year roadmap is also intended to give investors greater confidence in Thailand’s long-term policy stability.

What This Means for Thai Citizens

For Thai citizens, the plan is intended to translate into tangible benefits. Growth in high-tech, financial, and advanced manufacturing industries is expected to create higher-skilled, better-paying jobs. Investment in STEM and AI training aims to build a more competitive workforce, while faster budget disbursement and integration into new investment supply chains should benefit small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). As the economy expands, the government intends to reinvest additional revenue into public transport, healthcare, and education.

Key Takeaways

  • A new fast-track mechanism is intended to accelerate the transition from private-sector proposals to government action, organized around four core economic engines.
  • Official targets include lifting the country’s economic growth potential above 3%, placing Thailand in the global top 20 for competitiveness by 2030, and raising average per-capita income to roughly $15,000 within 12 years.
  • Investors can expect reduced red tape, faster licensing through e-government initiatives, and targeted support across seven priority industries.

Thai citizens stand to benefit from STEM/AI training programs, stronger SME support, higher-paying jobs, and improved public infrastructure.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Consumer and Platform Accountability: Increasing Scrutiny of Digital Intermediaries in Scam-Related Advertising

Recent litigation involving a major online platform in connection with alleged scam-related advertising has drawn renewed attention to the role of digital intermediaries in protecting consumers from online fraud. While the dispute itself remains subject to judicial determination, it highlights broader policy and regulatory questions regarding the responsibilities of digital platforms that facilitate advertising and online commercial activities.

Although Thailand has not yet adopted a comprehensive platform accountability framework specifically addressing scam-related advertisements, the issue aligns with wider regulatory efforts to combat technology-enabled fraud, strengthen consumer protection, and enhance trust in the digital economy. As online scams continue to generate substantial consumer losses, digital platforms may face increasing expectations from regulators, policymakers, and the public to take a more proactive role in preventing harm.

Existing Legal Framework:

Consumer Protection Law

The Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979) serves as Thailand’s principal legislation governing unfair and misleading advertising practices. The Act prohibits advertisements that are false, exaggerated, misleading, or otherwise likely to cause consumer misunderstanding.

Traditionally, enforcement efforts have focused on advertisers themselves. However, as digital advertising ecosystems become increasingly complex, questions have emerged regarding whether platform operators that facilitate the dissemination of advertisements should assume greater responsibility for preventing fraudulent or deceptive content from reaching consumers.

While the Act does not currently establish explicit platform liability for scam-related advertisements, its consumer protection objectives may influence future regulatory approaches to digital platform governance.

Technology Crime Prevention Framework

Thailand has significantly expanded its legal framework for combating online fraud through the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technology Crimes B.E. 2566 (2023), as amended.

The Emergency Decree reflects a broader policy shift toward preventive measures and imposes obligations on various stakeholders within the digital ecosystem to cooperate in addressing technology-related crimes. Although the current framework primarily focuses on financial institutions, telecommunications providers, and other relevant service providers, it demonstrates an increasing willingness by policymakers to require private-sector participants to implement measures aimed at reducing fraud risks.

This regulatory approach may provide insight into how future obligations for digital platforms could evolve.

Computer Crime Law

The Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 (2007), as amended, establishes legal mechanisms for addressing unlawful online activities and removing illegal content from computer systems.

Although the Act was not specifically designed to regulate online advertising, it forms part of the broader legal framework governing intermediary conduct and online content management. The Act illustrates Thailand’s recognition that service providers play an important role in preventing and addressing harmful online activities.

As digital risks continue to evolve, policymakers may look to existing intermediary-related principles when considering future platform governance measures.

Emerging Platform Accountability Trends:

Recent developments suggest that regulators are increasingly focused not only on the perpetrators of online scams but also on the systems and mechanisms that enable fraudulent advertisements to reach consumers.

Several themes are likely to influence future policy discussions.

Enhanced Advertiser Verification

One potential area of reform involves stronger verification requirements for advertisers.

Regulators may increasingly expect platforms to implement robust due diligence procedures before allowing advertisements to be published, particularly in high-risk sectors such as financial services, investments, health products, and online commerce.

Possible measures may include:

  • Verification of advertiser identity;
  • Verification of business registration status;
  • Confirmation of regulatory licenses where applicable; and
  • Risk-based screening of advertising accounts.

Such requirements could reduce opportunities for anonymous or fraudulent actors to exploit digital advertising systems.

Proactive Monitoring and Detection

Another emerging trend involves the expectation that platforms implement systems capable of identifying potentially fraudulent activities before consumer harm occurs.

This may include:

  • Automated monitoring of advertising content;
  • Detection of suspicious advertising patterns;
  • Escalation procedures for high-risk advertisements; and
  • Internal fraud-prevention mechanisms supported by technology and human review.

Although such obligations may increase compliance costs, regulators may increasingly view proactive monitoring as a necessary component of responsible platform governance.

Notice-and-Takedown Mechanisms

Future regulatory initiatives may place greater emphasis on the speed and effectiveness of platform responses to scam-related content.

Platforms may be expected to maintain clear procedures for:

  • Receiving consumer complaints;
  • Reviewing reports of fraudulent advertisements;
  • Removing harmful content within reasonable timeframes; and
  • Preserving evidence for law enforcement and regulatory investigations.

Effective notice-and-takedown systems are increasingly regarded as a key safeguard in digital marketplaces.

Transparency and Accountability Measures

Policymakers may also consider imposing enhanced transparency requirements on digital platforms.

Potential measures could include:

  • Disclosure of advertiser information;
  • Publication of platform enforcement policies;
  • Transparency reporting regarding fraudulent advertisements; and
  • Cooperation and reporting obligations involving regulatory authorities.

Such measures seek to improve accountability while strengthening consumer confidence in online transactions.

Potential Regulatory Developments:

At present, Thailand has not enacted legislation imposing comprehensive liability on digital platforms for scam-related advertisements. Nevertheless, several factors suggest that further regulatory developments remain possible.

First, technology-enabled fraud continues to be a significant public policy concern. Second, regulators increasingly favor preventive approaches that require cooperation from private-sector participants. Third, digital platforms occupy a central role in the dissemination of commercial information and consumer engagement.

As a result, future initiatives could emerge through:

  • Amendments to consumer protection legislations;
  • Sector-specific digital platform regulations;
  • Additional anti-fraud compliance requirements;
  • Regulatory guidelines issued by relevant authorities; or
  • Multi-agency cooperation frameworks addressing online fraud.

Businesses operating digital platforms should therefore closely monitor regulatory developments and assess whether existing governance frameworks remain sufficient in light of evolving expectations.

Implications for Platform Operators:

Even in the absence of immediate legislative reform, platform operators may benefit from reviewing their existing compliance and risk-management practices.

Areas for consideration include:

  • Advertiser onboarding procedures;
  • Fraud detection and monitoring capabilities;
  • Internal complaint management systems;
  • Content moderation policies;
  • Record retention practices; and
  • Cooperation protocols with regulators and law enforcement authorities.

Organizations that adopt robust governance measures at an early stage may be better positioned to manage regulatory risk and maintain consumer trust as expectations continue to evolve.

Key Takeaways:

  • Recent litigation involving a major online platform has intensified discussion regarding the role of digital intermediaries in preventing scam-related advertising.
  • Thailand currently does not impose comprehensive statutory liability on digital platforms for fraudulent advertisements, but regulatory expectations are evolving.
  • Existing laws, including the Consumer Protection Act, the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technology Crimes, and the Computer Crime Act, demonstrate increasing policy emphasis on consumer protection and fraud prevention.
  • Future regulatory initiatives may focus on advertiser verification, proactive monitoring, notice-and-takedown procedures, and transparency obligations.

Digital platform operators should proactively assess their governance and compliance frameworks in anticipation of increasing regulatory scrutiny and consumer protection expectations.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

NBTC’s Third Broadcasting and Television Master Plan (2026–2030): Expanded Oversight of OTT Platforms and the Future of Digital Broadcasting

Introduction:

Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) is currently conducting public consultations on the Draft Third Broadcasting and Television Master Plan (2026–2030), which is intended to serve as the principal policy framework for the broadcasting sector over the next five years.

The draft plan reflects the NBTC’s recognition that the media landscape has undergone significant transformation as audiences increasingly consume content through online platforms and streaming services rather than traditional broadcasting channels. In response, the NBTC is proposing a broader regulatory approach that extends beyond conventional television and radio operators to encompass digital content ecosystems, online media platforms, and emerging forms of content distribution.

The proposed framework also addresses growing concerns regarding misinformation, the competitiveness of domestic digital platforms, and the future of the digital television sector as existing licenses approach expiry.

Greater Focus on OTT and Online Media Platforms:

A key feature of the draft plan is the NBTC’s intention to strengthen oversight of over-the-top (OTT) services and online media platforms.

The traditional broadcasting regulatory framework was designed primarily for licensed television and radio operators. However, the rapid growth of streaming platforms, social media services, and other online content providers has significantly altered viewing behavior and challenged the effectiveness of existing regulatory models.

The draft plan therefore contemplates the development of regulatory mechanisms appropriate for the digital environment, including measures aimed at enhancing accountability and governance of online content distribution platforms. While the specific regulatory tools remain under consideration, the proposal signals the NBTC’s intention to play a more active role in overseeing digital media services that reach Thai audiences.

This policy direction reflects a broader recognition that online platforms have become an integral part of the communications ecosystem and increasingly influence public discourse, information consumption, and media competition.

Measures to Combat Fake News and Harmful Content:

The draft plan identifies misinformation, disinformation, and content that may create social division or public disorder as important regulatory concerns.

The NBTC proposes closer cooperation with relevant government agencies, media organizations, and digital platform operators to strengthen mechanisms for monitoring and addressing false or misleading information disseminated through broadcasting and online channels.

Particular attention is expected to be given to content that may affect public safety, national security, social harmony, or public confidence in state institutions. The draft plan also contemplates the development of systems that promote responsible media practices and improve public awareness regarding information verification.

Although detailed implementation measures have not yet been announced, platform operators and content providers should anticipate increased regulatory attention to content governance and compliance frameworks in the coming years.

Promotion of Domestic Digital Platforms and Local Content:

Another important objective of the draft plan is the promotion of domestic digital platforms and the strengthening of Thailand’s content industry.

The NBTC has expressed support for initiatives that enhance the competitiveness of local media operators and encourage the development of platforms capable of serving Thai audiences while promoting domestic content creation.

The draft plan also seeks to encourage innovation in broadcasting technologies and digital content distribution. Such initiatives are intended to support sustainable growth within the media sector and reduce structural disadvantages faced by local operators in competing with large international digital platforms.

This policy direction aligns with broader national objectives relating to digital economy development and technological self-reliance.

Preparing for the Post-2029 Digital Television Landscape:

The draft plan also addresses the future of the digital television industry as existing digital television licenses are expected to expire around 2029.

Since the transition to digital broadcasting, television operators have faced substantial economic pressures arising from changing consumer behavior, fragmentation of audiences, and increasing competition from online media services. These developments have raised questions regarding the long-term sustainability of the current broadcasting model.

In response, the NBTC intends to develop a roadmap for the future of digital television. The roadmap is expected to examine the role of terrestrial broadcasting in an increasingly digital environment, potential adjustments to licensing frameworks, spectrum management strategies, and measures to support industry sustainability.

The outcome of these discussions is likely to influence the structure of Thailand’s broadcasting sector for years to come and may have significant implications for broadcasters, investors, content producers, and telecommunications operators.

Implications for Businesses:

The draft master plan demonstrates a regulatory shift towards a more integrated approach to media governance, where distinctions between traditional broadcasting services and online content platforms are becoming less pronounced.

Businesses that may be affected by future policy developments include:

  • OTT and streaming service providers;
  • social media and content-sharing platforms;
  • broadcasters and television operators;
  • telecommunications service providers;
  • digital advertising businesses; and
  • content creators and media companies.

Although the draft plan does not itself create immediate legal obligations, it provides a clear indication of the NBTC’s regulatory priorities and may serve as the foundation for future regulations, licensing requirements, and policy initiatives affecting the digital media sector.

Stakeholders should therefore monitor the consultation process and forthcoming regulatory developments closely.

Outlook:

The Draft Third Broadcasting and Television Master Plan (2026–2030) reflects the NBTC’s effort to modernize the regulatory framework governing Thailand’s broadcasting and media sectors in response to technological change and evolving consumer behavior.

By focusing on OTT regulation, combating misinformation, promoting domestic digital platforms, and preparing for the expiry of digital television licenses, the NBTC is signaling a broader and more proactive approach to media regulation in the digital era.

While many of the proposed measures remain at the policy stage, the draft plan provides important insight into the direction of future regulatory developments and the issues that are likely to shape Thailand’s communications and media landscape over the coming years.

Key Takeaways:

  • The NBTC is consulting on the Draft Third Broadcasting and Television Master Plan (2026–2030), which will guide broadcasting policy over the next five years.
  • Regulatory attention is increasingly shifting towards OTT services and online media platforms as digital content consumption continues to grow.
  • The draft plan proposes stronger measures to address fake news, disinformation, and other forms of harmful online content.
  • The NBTC seeks to promote domestic digital platforms and strengthen the competitiveness of Thailand’s content industry.
  • A roadmap is being developed to address the future of digital television ahead of the expected expiry of digital TV licenses around 2029.

Although no immediate legal obligations arise from the draft plan, businesses should monitor future regulatory initiatives that may affect platform governance, content regulation, and broadcasting operations.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Notification of the Competent Officer on Exchange Control (No. 38) — Draft Amendment

Introduction

On 25 March 2026, the Competent Officer on Exchange Control issued the Draft Notification on the Criteria and Procedures for Foreign Exchange Transactions (No. 38) (the “Draft Notification”). The Draft Notification proposes amendments to the existing notification dated 31 March 2004 (as amended), with the principal objective of enhancing regulatory clarity and easing documentary requirements for certain foreign exchange (“FX”) transactions.

The proposed amendments primarily concern documentary requirements, the timing for submission of supporting documents, and the specific treatment of certain transaction categories, including FX purchases for foreign currency deposit (“FCD”) accounts, gold import payments, and hedging transactions. The Draft Notification is expected to have material practical implications for authorized juristic persons, financial institutions, and business operators engaged in cross-border FX transactions.

Key Amendments

1. FX Purchases for Own Foreign Currency Deposit (FCD) Accounts

Under the Draft Notification, where a customer purchases foreign currency solely for deposit into its own FCD account, authorized juristic persons are no longer required to request supporting documents, irrespective of the transaction amount.

This amendment represents a significant relaxation of administrative requirements and reflects a regulatory policy direction toward facilitating liquidity management and FX flexibility for market participants. Supervisory oversight will continue to be exercised under the existing FCD regulatory framework.

2. FX Purchases for Gold Import Payments

In contrast to the relaxation described above, the Draft Notification expressly tightens documentary requirements for FX purchases made for the purpose of settling payments for imported gold.

For such transactions, authorized juristic persons must request supporting documents in all cases, without regard to transaction value. No monetary threshold or exemption applies.

This differentiated treatment reflects the regulator’s continued emphasis on monitoring transactions considered to carry heightened financial, market, or systemic risk.

3. Timing for Submission of Supporting Documents

The Draft Notification clarifies and differentiates timing requirements for the submission of supporting documents as follows:

General Rule Supporting documents must be submitted on the transaction date (the “Trade Date”).

Relaxation for Certain Spot Transactions For spot FX transactions not related to gold import payments, authorized juristic persons may, where justified by necessity and reasonableness, permit the submission of supporting documents on the settlement date (the “Settlement Date”) in lieu of the Trade Date.

Mandatory Submission on the Settlement Date Submission of supporting documents on the Settlement Date is required for:

  • forward FX transactions with a value of USD 200,000 or equivalent or more; and
  • FX purchases for gold import payments, regardless of amount.

4. FX Transactions for Hedging Based on Forecast Exposure

For FX transactions entered into for the purpose of hedging or managing exchange rate risk arising from forecast exposure, the Draft Notification introduces greater flexibility in the categories of acceptable documentation.

In addition to forecast-based documents, customers may now submit:

  • evidence of underlying obligations; or
  • documents demonstrating exposure to exchange rate risk, such as billing notices or contractual indicators.

This change more closely aligns regulatory practice with commercial reality, particularly in the context of treasury and risk management operations.

5. Sale of Foreign Currency by Residents

The Draft Notification amends the existing provisions governing the sale of foreign currency by persons resident in Thailand, applicable to both spot and forward transactions.

Authorized juristic persons are permitted to facilitate such transactions on a broader basis, in particular where the seller:

  • will receive foreign currency income in the future; or
  • maintains funds in its own FCD account.

This amendment provides additional operational flexibility while preserving applicable reporting and disclosure obligations.

Key Takeaways

  • FCD Transactions: FX purchases for deposit into a customer’s own FCD account no longer require supporting documents, regardless of amount.
  • Gold Imports: FX purchases for gold import payments remain strictly regulated, with mandatory documentation required in all cases.
  • Document Timing: While the Trade Date remains the default submission deadline, limited flexibility has been introduced for non-gold spot FX transactions.
  • Large Forward FX Transactions: Forward contracts valued at USD 200,000 or more require documentation to be submitted on the Settlement Date.
  • Hedging Transactions: A broader range of documentary evidence is now acceptable for forecast-based hedging arrangements.
  • Operational Impact: Financial institutions and business operators are advised to review and update their internal policies, compliance checklists, and transaction workflows to ensure alignment with the Draft Notification.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Bank of Thailand Proposes Stricter Documentation Requirements for Inbound Foreign Exchange Transactions

In addition to the proposed increase in the foreign income repatriation threshold under the Bank of Thailand’s relaxations to foreign exchange regulations (as outlined in our previous article, Proposed Relaxations to Foreign Exchange Regulations), the Bank of Thailand (“BOT”) has proposed measures to strengthen regulatory oversight of inbound foreign exchange transactions. These measures aim to mitigate appreciation pressure on the Thai Baht, enhance transaction transparency, and prevent the inflow of funds inconsistent with their declared sources or otherwise undesirable.

The BOT has launched a public consultation on the Draft Notification on Rules and Procedures for Foreign Exchange Transactions (Draft Rules on Verification of Inbound Foreign Exchange Transactions). The consultation period runs from 30 December 2025 to 16 January 2026, with feedback informing the final regulatory framework.

Current Regulatory Framework

Under existing rules:

  • Foreign currency may be brought into Thailand without amount limitation for conversion into Thai Baht or deposit into a foreign currency deposit (“FCD”) account.
  • Transaction participants are required only to declare the source of funds.
  • No supporting documentary evidence is currently required.

Rationale for the Draft Rules

The proposed amendments are intended to:

  • Enhance scrutiny of inbound foreign exchange transactions and align inbound controls with outbound foreign exchange rules, under which purchases or transfers of foreign currency of USD 200,000 or more (or equivalent) are subject to documentary verification unless Know Your Business (“KYB”) procedures have been applied.
  • Increase transparency in foreign exchange transactions.
  • Prevent misrepresentation of fund sources and the use of inbound transactions for non-genuine or undesirable purposes.
  • Mitigate appreciation pressure on the Thai Baht by moderating demand arising from inbound foreign exchange transactions through enhanced verification and documentation requirements.

Key Features of the Draft Rules

While inbound foreign exchange transactions remain unrestricted in terms of amount, the Draft Rules propose stricter documentary verification requirements, differentiated by the type of licensed service provider.

1. Transactions Conducted Through Commercial Banks

A. Transactions of USD 200,000 or More (or equivalent)

Commercial banks are required to verify supporting documents corresponding to the declared source of funds on a transaction-by-transaction basis.

Exception: Documentary verification may be waived for routine transactions of business customers that are well known to the bank and subject to ongoing KYB and Customer Due Diligence (“CDD”) processes.

B. Certain High-Risk Inbound Transactions

For inbound transactions that may be used for non-business-related purposes or where the source of funds is unclear, commercial banks would be required to obtain supporting documentation on a transaction-by-transaction basis, even if the customer has already undergone KYC/KYB procedures. Such transactions include, but are not limited to:

  • Proceeds from the sale of real estate
  • Proceeds from the sale of digital assets
  • Capital inflows other than direct investment or securities investment
  • Other income sources that cannot be clearly identified

C. Digital Asset-Related Proceeds

Where foreign currency is derived from the sale of digital assets, banks must additionally obtain documents evidencing either:

  • The source of the digital assets, or
  • The source of funds used to acquire such digital assets.

2. Transactions Conducted Through Non-Bank Operators

A. Transactions of USD 200,000 or More (or equivalent)

Non-bank operators would be required to verify supporting documents corresponding to the declared source of funds for every transaction, without exception.

B. Digital Asset-Related Proceeds

Supporting documents evidencing the source of the digital assets or the funds used to acquire such assets must be obtained in all cases.

C. Inbound Cash Transactions Exceeding USD 15,000 (or equivalent)

Non-bank operators must obtain the customs declaration evidencing that the cash was declared to Thai Customs authorities upon entry into Thailand.

Potential Impacts

  • High-value transaction participants and business operators not subject to ongoing KYB processes, or whose transactions fall within categories requiring enhanced scrutiny, may face increased compliance burdens, particularly in preparing and submitting supporting documentation.
  • Commercial banks and non-bank operators will bear additional compliance and operational responsibilities in verifying documents and ensuring adherence to the enhanced regulatory standards.

Conclusion

The Draft Rules represent a clear move toward stricter verification of inbound foreign exchange transactions, particularly for high-value transfers and funds derived from digital assets or non-traditional sources. Although inbound transactions remain unrestricted in amount, documentation requirements will increase significantly. Market participants should review their transaction structures and supporting documentation in advance to ensure readiness once the rules are finalized.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Government Measures to Promote Film Production in Thailand: Key Incentives and Regulatory Requirements

On 2 December 2025, the Cabinet of Thailand approved the Measures to Promote Film Production in Thailand (the “Measures“), designating the Ministry of Culture as the principal authority responsible for their implementation. The Ministry of Culture is mandated to prescribe the relevant eligibility criteria, incentives, and implementation procedures in accordance with the Cabinet’s approval.

The Thai film industry is recognized as a creative industry with substantial potential in terms of both economic contribution and the promotion of Thailand’s national image on the global stage. Pursuant to the government’s strategy to enhance the competitiveness of creative industries, Thai films have been designated as a Flagship Creative Industry with the capacity to compete with foreign productions and stimulate economic activity across multiple related sectors.

Objectives of the Measures

These Measures are designed to support and strengthen Thai film production at both domestic and international levels and encompass the following objectives:

  • Promote high-quality Thai film production – To support the production of films that meet international standards, thereby enhancing the competitiveness of Thai films in the global market.
  • Enhance industry competitiveness – To strengthen the capabilities of Thai film operators through skills development, infrastructure improvement, and market access expansion.
  • Support cultural exports and soft power – To leverage film as a medium for promoting Thai culture internationally and reinforcing Thailand’s soft power presence abroad.

Benefits Under the Measures

These Measures provide financial support to eligible Thai film productions to encourage high-quality content, enhance industry competitiveness, and promote Thai culture internationally.

Main Benefit

Eligible film projects with a production budget of at least THB 15 million are entitled to financial support equivalent to 15% of qualifying production expenses per project.

Additional Benefits

Supplementary financial support can be granted if certain conditions are met, as set out below:

  • Creative Content Incentive – Film projects presenting innovative storylines or creative content addressing the issues as prescribed by the Subcommittee on the Promotion of Film Production in Thailand under the Ministry of Culture, the applicant shall be eligible to apply for an additional incentive of 5%.
  • High-Budget Production Incentive – Film projects with production costs ranging from THB 40 million to less than THB 50 million will receive an additional 2.5% incentive. Film projects with production costs of THB 50 million or more will receive an additional 5% incentive.
  • International Screening Incentive – Film projects screened in cinemas or broadcast on television in at least four foreign countries or released on a streaming platform accessible in at least four foreign countries (with at least one country located outside Southeast Asia), will receive an additional 5% incentive.

Applicant Qualifications

Applicants seeking benefits under these Measures must satisfy the following criteria:

  • Thai Ownership – The applicant must be a legal entity in which more than 50% of the shareholding is held by Thai nationals, with at least one-half of the directors or managers being Thai nationals.
  • Operational History and Compliance – The entity must have been in operation for a minimum of two years and be duly registered with the Department of Business Development and other relevant government authorities. The applicant must have filed corporate income tax and value-added tax returns and maintained audited financial statements.
  • Copyright Ownership or Rights – The entity must either (i) own the copyright in the film, which must qualify as a Thai work, or (ii) lawfully hold the relevant copyright or exploitation rights obtained from a Thai copyright owner.
  • Business Purpose – The entity must operate in the film industry or related sectors, with such business objectives expressly stated in its business registration certificate filed with the Department of Business Development or other relevant authorities.
  • Office in Thailand – The entity must maintain its principal office or an establishment in Thailand that serves as an operational business location or official contact point.
  • Production Expense Threshold – The relevant film project must incur production expenses of at least THB 15 million per project within Thailand.

Conditions of the Measure

These Measures are implemented under the Thai Government’s framework. The Committee for the Consideration of Financial Support under these Measures (the “Committee”) is responsible for reviewing all financial documents and verifying compliance with regulations prescribed by the Revenue Department.

  • Legal Compliance – Film projects must fully comply with Thai laws and must not be subject to any legal disputes.
  • Eligible Expenses – Financial support covers costs incurred during the pre-production, production, and post-production stages. Expenses related to marketing and publicity, overseas expenditures, interest, gifts, entertainment, or prizes are excluded.
  • Exclusive Incentive – Film projects that received financial support or were granted incentives under other measures implemented by the Thai government shall not be eligible to apply for or receive support under these Measures.
  • Approval Requirement – Film projects must be reviewed and approved by the Film and Video Review Committee under the Film and Video Act B.E. 2551 (2008) or otherwise comply with the criteria prescribed by the Ministry of Culture.
  • Eligible Productions – Eligible productions include Thai films, Thai television series, and Thai music videos.
  • Revocation of Benefits – Approved incentives may be revoked under the following circumstances:
    • The applicant fails to produce the film or submit the required documents within the prescribed timeframe.
    • The content of the film violates Thai law or misrepresents, undermines, or damages Thailand’s image or national institutions.

Procedures for Submission of an Application for Entitlement to Financial Support

Application Submission

Applicants who meet the above-mentioned qualifications are able to submit the documents to apply for eligibility to receive financial support up to 2 times per year during the following periods.

  • Round 1: 1 January – 31 March
  • Round 2: 1 July – 30 September

Review and Approval

The Committee shall review the applications and approve eligible applicants as recipients of financial support within 60 days from the date of submission.

Production Timeline

Applicants approved as eligible recipients of financial support must complete the film production within 2 years from the date of approval. Applicants shall initially advance and bear all production costs at their own expense and subsequently submit an application for reimbursement.

Claiming Financial Support

  • Upon completion of the film production, applicants shall submit all required supporting documents for the application for financial support to the Committee within 90 days from the date of completion, in accordance with the approved production period.
  • An auditor appointed by the Committee shall review the submitted documents within 90 days.
  • The Committee shall review all documents verified by the auditor and approve the reimbursement in accordance with the said Measures within 60 days from the date of receipt of such documents with the said Measures and disburse the reimbursement to the eligible recipient of the financial support.
  • An eligible recipient who has already been granted the principal incentive (i.e., 15% of production costs per film) under these Measures and who wishes to apply for additional incentives under these Measures shall submit the relevant supporting evidence within 3 years from the date of approval of the financial support.

Current Program Status

The Cabinet has approved the underlying principles of these Measures, and the Ministry of Culture is currently preparing the detailed implementing measures for submission to the Cabinet for final approval. However, due to the dissolution of Parliament, final approval will be deferred until the formation of a new Cabinet.

Conclusion

These Measures aim to enhance the quality and competitiveness of Thai films while supporting the development of industry professionals. These Measures are expected to stimulate investment, create employment opportunities, and promote Thai culture through films, series, and music videos to audiences both domestically and internationally. Overall, these Measures contribute to strengthening Thailand’s national image and advancing the creative economy.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Thailand’s Entertainment Complex Bill: Legal Innovation Meets Political Reality

The draft Entertainment Complex Bill represented Thailand’s strategic legislative initiative to establish the country as a regional tourism and entertainment hub through the regulated legalization of casino operations. As detailed in our initial analysis, “Thailand Unveils Draft Entertainment Complex Bill: A Path to Casino Legalization,” this proposal sought to attract substantial foreign investment, enhance tourism revenue, and curtail illegal gambling activities through a comprehensive regulatory framework that integrated casino facilities within large-scale entertainment complexes featuring hotels, shopping centers, stadiums, and gaming venues.

However, as documented in our subsequent report, “Updated: Thailand Unveils Draft Entertainment Complex Bill,” the legislation encountered significant obstacles that ultimately led to its withdrawal from the parliamentary process on July 9, 2025. This development demonstrates the complex interplay between economic policy objectives, public sentiment, and political feasibility in Thailand’s legislative environment.

Legislative Framework and Economic Projections

Original Policy Architecture

The Entertainment Complex Bill was structured to legalize casino operations exclusively within fully licensed entertainment venues, requiring comprehensive integrated facilities including hotels, shopping centers, stadiums, and gaming centers. The legislation established stringent entry requirements, mandating applicants to register Thai companies with a minimum paid-up capital of THB 10 billion.

The framework incorporated specific access controls for Thai citizens, including a THB 5,000 per-visit admission fee and mandatory fixed deposit requirements, alongside comprehensive financial and background verification procedures. Government projections estimated the initiative would generate over THB 100 billion in investment, increase annual tourism revenue by 5-10 percent, and produce between THB 12-40 billion in annual tax revenue while simultaneously reducing illegal gambling activities.

Political Trajectory and Opposition

Despite receiving Cabinet approval in January 2025, the Bill encountered substantial resistance from civil society organizations, religious groups, political instability and the general public. On July 8, 2025, the Cabinet formally withdrew the legislation from Parliament’s consideration agenda, characterizing the action as a deferral for additional public consultation rather than permanent abandonment. However, the indefinite nature of this delay has raised questions regarding the bill’s long-term viability.

Future Legislative Considerations

While the draft has been withdrawn, the possibility of reintroduction remains viable. Government officials have indicated that the bill may be reconsidered during future legislative sessions once political conditions stabilize and a broader public consensus is achieved. No specific timeline has been established, though the issue is expected to remain on the national policy agenda.

Analysis and Implications

Balancing Economic Innovation with Social Responsibility

The Entertainment Complex Bill exemplified Thailand’s attempt to pursue strategic legal reform aimed at modernizing its tourism sector while establishing controlled regulatory frameworks for casino operations. Although the legislation possessed sound economic rationale, its social and political foundations proved insufficiently robust to withstand public scrutiny and political volatility.

The government’s decision to defer the bill reflects the imperative to carefully balance legislative objectives with public concerns and democratic accountability. This case underscores the critical importance of inclusive policy dialogue and precise legal frameworks in complex regulatory environments.

Recommendations for Future Policy Development

Future attempts to reintroduce similar legislation must prioritize several key elements:

Stakeholder Engagement: Comprehensive consultation with diverse societal groups, including religious organizations, civil society, and economic stakeholders, must precede legislative drafting to ensure broad-based support.

Regulatory Precision: Enhanced specificity in regulatory frameworks, particularly regarding social safeguards, taxation mechanisms, and oversight structures, will be essential for building public confidence.

Political Stability: Successful passage will require stable political conditions and coalition support to navigate the legislative process effectively.

Public Education: Transparent communication regarding economic benefits, social protections, and regulatory mechanisms will be crucial for building public understanding and acceptance.

Conclusion

The Entertainment Complex Bill’s withdrawal illustrates the complex dynamics inherent in Thailand’s legislative process, where economic innovation must be carefully balanced against social considerations and political realities. While the bill’s economic merits were substantial, its social and political foundations required further development to ensure successful implementation.

This experience demonstrates that sustainable legal reform in Thailand requires not only sound economic policy but also robust public engagement, political consensus, and comprehensive regulatory frameworks. Future efforts to advance similar legislation must prioritize inclusive dialogue, precise legal mechanisms, and broad-based stakeholder support to achieve lasting success.

The case ultimately reinforces the principle that effective governance requires harmonizing economic innovation with social responsibility, ensuring that policy development is both economically viable and socially sustainable. Only through such consensus-driven approaches can Thailand successfully navigate the complex intersection of legal reform, economic development, and democratic accountability.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Entertainment Place Act B.E. 2509 (1966): Proposed Amendments

The Entertainment Place Act B.E. 2509 (1966) (Act) has been in effect for over five decades, governing the operations of entertainment venues in Thailand. However, its provisions have become outdated, failing to address contemporary issues such as illegal activities, public order violations, and inadequate penalties. To address these shortcomings, a draft amendment to the Act has been proposed, aiming to strengthen regulatory oversight, enhance penalties, and align the law with current societal needs. This article outlines the key proposed amendments and their implications.

Proposed Amendments to the Act:

The draft amendments introduce several significant changes to the Act, focusing on stricter regulations, enhanced enforcement powers, and increased accountability for operators. The key changes are as follows:

  1. Prohibition of Illegal Activities by Licensees
    The amendments add provisions to Section 16 (7)-(11) of the Act, explicitly prohibiting licensees from engaging in or permitting activities that violate public order or moral standards. These include offenses under laws related to gambling, prostitution, human trafficking, money laundering, prevention of women and child trafficking, and organized crime (as defined in the Penal Code). Licensees who commit, consent to, or neglect to prevent such violations will face legal consequences.
  2. Criminal Penalties for Violations
    New criminal penalties are proposed for licensees who breach the prohibitions outlined in Section 16 (7)-(11). These penalties aim to deter non-compliance and ensure that violations are addressed with appropriate severity, reflecting the seriousness of the offenses.
  3. Enhanced Authority of Officials
    The amendments grant officials greater powers to enforce compliance, including the ability to:
    • Refuse license renewals.
    • Suspend or revoke licenses.
    • Order the closure of venues.

            These measures will apply to licensees who fail to meet eligibility criteria or operate venues in ways that disrupt public order or moral standards. The severity of the penalty will depend on the gravity of the violation.

people dancing inside building
  1. Closure of Unlicensed Venues
    Officials will have the authority to order the closure of unlicensed entertainment venues for up to five years. The duration of closure will be determined based on the circumstances and severity of the offense, providing a strong deterrent against illegal operations.
  2. Stricter Penalties for Operating Without a License
    The amendments revise penalties for operating unlicensed venues, imposing imprisonment and fines. If additional offenses are committed in conjunction with operating without a license, the penalties will be escalated to reflect the compounded nature of the violations.
  3. Penalties for Violating Closure Orders
    A new provision imposes criminal penalties on individuals who defy official closure orders, ensuring that such directives are respected and enforced.
  4. Compensation for Damages
    The amendments introduce a mechanism for victims to claim compensation for damages caused by licensed or unlicensed operators who serve alcohol to intoxicated individuals, leading to disruptive or uncontrollable behavior. This provision enhances accountability and provides recourse for affected parties.
  5. Asset Forfeiture
    Courts will be empowered to confiscate assets obtained through, used in, or reasonably believed to be connected to offenses under the Act. This measure targets the financial incentives of illegal activities, further discouraging non-compliance.

Key Takeaways:

  • Strengthened Oversight: The proposed amendments enhance regulatory control over entertainment venues, addressing gaps in the current law that allow illegal activities to persist.
  • Increased Accountability: Licensees face stricter prohibitions and penalties, ensuring greater responsibility for maintaining public order and moral standards.
  • Empowered Enforcement: Officials gain expanded authority to suspend, revoke, or refuse licenses and close unlicensed venues, with penalties tailored to the severity of offenses.
  • Victim Protection: Provisions for compensation and asset forfeiture provide remedies for victims and deter illegal operations.
  • Modernized Framework: The amendments align the Act with contemporary societal challenges, promoting a safer and more orderly environment.

These proposed changes reflect a comprehensive effort to modernize the Act, ensuring it remains effective in regulating entertainment venues while safeguarding public welfare.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

on by

Over The Top: Thailand’s Push to Regulate Online Streaming Platforms

In a significant step toward managing the rapid rise of Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms, Thailand’s Ministry of Digital Economy and Society has launched an initiative to bring these online streaming services under closer scrutiny. The Ministry has entrusted the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) and the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) with the task of forming a dedicated working committee. This group is charged with studying and proposing regulatory measures for OTT platforms—services that deliver diverse content, including movies, TV shows, music, and podcasts, directly to users via the internet. Unlike conventional media, these platforms operate independently of mobile network providers, cable operators, or digital TV broadcasters. Well-known examples include Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, TikTok, and Spotify.

Government Concerns:

The decision to regulate OTT platforms arises from mounting concerns about their potential exploitation. Authorities have noted that these services can serve as conduits for online crimes, such as fraud, the spread of inappropriate content, and copyright violations, all of which have caused significant harm to the public. In response, the Ministry aims to create a digital landscape that is secure, equitable, and sustainable, benefiting consumers, service providers, and the digital economy as a whole.

Focus Areas:

To this end, the working committee has identified five core areas of focus, each addressing distinct challenges posed by OTT platforms while fostering a fair and innovative digital environment.

little girl holding a tablet

1. Enhancing Safety Measures

The first area of focus is strengthening safety protocols. This involves curbing copyright infringement and preventing access to illegal content. The committee plans to introduce identity verification measures to deter misuse of these platforms, ensuring they are not exploited for illicit purposes.

2. Regulating Content

The second priority centers on content oversight. The committee seeks to refine existing laws, empowering regulatory bodies to monitor and control the material distributed on OTT platforms more effectively. Additionally, foreign platforms operating in Thailand will be required to obtain licenses and comply with local laws. The initiative also includes advocating for international cooperation in establishing shared regulatory frameworks.

3. Boosting the Digital Industry and Taxation

The third focus area aims to promote Thailand’s digital industry while ensuring fair economic contributions from OTT platforms. This includes supporting local entrepreneurs in developing homegrown platforms and mandating that OTT services generating revenue from Thai users pay taxes in the country. These efforts are intended to drive the rapid growth of domestic digital businesses and create added value within the national economy.

4. Protecting Personal Data

Data privacy is the fourth pillar of this regulatory framework. OTT platforms will be required to adhere to stringent data protection standards, such as those outlined in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Measures will also be implemented to regulate the collection and use of user data, safeguarding individuals’ privacy rights and preventing abuses.

5. Ensuring Fair Competition

Finally, the committee will address competition in the OTT market. The goal is to prevent large platforms from establishing monopolies that could stifle fair competition. By supporting the development of local platforms and promoting market decentralization, the initiative seeks to level the playing field and encourage innovation.

man in black suit holding white ceramic mug

A Forward-Looking Approach:

This comprehensive strategy reflects Thailand’s recognition of both the opportunities and risks presented by OTT platforms. As these services continue to reshape how people consume media, the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society, alongside the NBTC and ETDA, is taking proactive steps to harness their potential while mitigating their downsides. By focusing on safety, content regulation, economic fairness, data protection, and competitive balance, Thailand aims to set a precedent for responsible digital governance—one that could resonate on the global stage.

As the working committee begins its task, the nation watches closely, hopeful that these measures will pave the way for a digital future that is not only vibrant and innovative but also secure and just for all.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles