Closing Nominee Loopholes: Thailand’s Legal Reform to Safeguard Property Ownership

on
bird s eye view of rooftops

Closing Nominee Loopholes: Thailand’s Legal Reform to Safeguard Property Ownership

On 24 June 2025, the Cabinet formally acknowledged the “Findings and Recommendations of the Ombudsman Regarding the Ownership or Possession of Land or Real Estate by Nominees Acting on Behalf of Foreigners.” These recommendations were submitted in response to growing concerns over the circumvention of land ownership laws by foreign nationals through the use of Thai nominees.

This initiative follows the discovery of widespread land and property acquisitions by foreign nationals, raising significant concerns regarding national security, economic stability, and equality of opportunity for Thai citizens. In numerous instances, foreigners have circumvented legal restrictions by utilizing Thai nominees to bypass requirements such as marriage to Thai citizens, land ownership through Thai children, long-term leases, and company structures that disguise actual control.

One prevalent mechanism involves establishing a Thai-registered legal entity that appears to be locally owned but is ultimately controlled by foreign interests through nominee shareholders or preference shares. This practice not only undermines the intent of existing legislation but also contributes to rising land prices, thereby reducing accessibility for Thai nationals—particularly in high-demand areas such as Bangkok and Chiang Mai.

Key Recommendations

1. Department of Business Development (DBD)

The DBD has been designated to play a central role in preventing and monitoring nominee arrangements, particularly in legal entities with foreign shareholding:

  1. System Development
  • Developing an AI-driven system to process and analyze corporate data to identify high-risk juristic persons potentially acting as nominees.
  1. Amendment to the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA) to include:
  • A broader definition of “foreigner” to encompass those exercising control or management through Thai nominees.
  • Clear definitions of “nominee” and “disguised transaction” to cover indirect ownership and concealed financial or property dealings.
  • Explicit inclusion of both direct and indirect shareholding in regulatory scrutiny, with enhanced qualifications for the 51% Thai shareholders.
  • Classification of legal entities controlled through preference shares as foreign juristic persons.
  • Updated requirements for registered capital, including mandatory submission of evidence demonstrating actual payment (e.g., bank statements) to prevent false declarations.
  • Designation of FBA violations as predicate offenses under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, enabling asset seizure during investigations.
  • Granting the DBD investigative and arrest powers in nominee-related offenses.
peaceful coast washed by calm water of endless ocean

2. Department of Lands

  1. Enforcement Guidelines
  • Issuance of clear enforcement guidelines and their widespread circulation to prevent land ownership by foreign nationals through nominee arrangements.
  1. Amendments to the Land Code to:
  • Increase penalties for foreigners violating land ownership laws.
  • Forfeit unlawfully held land to the state without compensation to the foreign holder.

3. Lawyers Council of Thailand

  1. Code of Ethics
  • Introduction and enforcement of a binding code of ethics that prohibits legal professionals from advising on or facilitating nominee structures.
  1. Professional Conduct Rules
  • Establishment of professional conduct rules to ensure lawyers do not support arrangements that bypass foreign ownership restrictions.

Implementation Framework

The Ministry of Commerce has been designated as the principal agency to deliberate on this matter in collaboration with relevant agencies and to submit the outcome of such deliberations to the Cabinet Secretariat within 30 days for further consideration by the Cabinet.

The Cabinet has acknowledged the Ombudsman’s findings and recommendations, directing the Ministry of Commerce to conduct a comprehensive review of the issue. The Ministry of Commerce will collaborate with 13 other agencies, including Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Industry, Board of Investment, Royal Thai Police, Anti-Money Laundering Office, Internal Security Operations Command and Bank of Thailand.

This joint effort aims to reach a definitive resolution within 30 days, with the Ministry of Commerce responsible for submitting a summary of its findings, actions taken, and overall recommendations to the Cabinet Secretariat for further consideration.

Conclusion

The Cabinet’s recognition of the Ombudsman’s findings represents a crucial step in addressing a long-standing loophole in Thailand’s property ownership regulations. While foreign investment remains vital to Thailand’s economy, the misuse of nominee structures has distorted the property market and undermined legal integrity. The lack of unified enforcement and ambiguous legal definitions have limited the government’s ability to effectively regulate foreign participation in land ownership.

With a whole-of-government approach now underway, Thai authorities aim to restore fairness, uphold legal safeguards, and ensure that land and property ownership align with national interests. The forthcoming recommendations from the Ministry of Commerce and its partner agencies will be decisive in shaping future land policies and enforcement mechanisms.

Author: Panisa Suwanmatajarn, Managing Partner.

Other Articles

Posted in

Tagged as